Mark Cuban Discusses SEC’s Role in FTX Regulation: A Comparative Analysis with Japan’s Crypto Approach (FTX)

FTT

FTT/USDT

$0.3670
-2.34%
24h Volume

$518,528.48

24h H/L

$0.3865 / $0.3542

Change: $0.0323 (9.12%)

Funding Rate

+0.0013%

Longs pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
FTT
FTT
Daily

$0.3670

1.83%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$0.4793
Resistance 2$0.4190
Resistance 1$0.3708
Price$0.3670
Support 1$0.3502
Support 2$0.1854
Support 3$0.0995
Pivot (PP):$0.364433
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):30.2
(05:07 PM UTC)
2 min read

Contents

1020 views
0 comments
  • Mark Cuban, billionaire and Shark Tank star, criticizes the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its handling of the FTX-related crypto collapse in late 2022.
  • Cuban suggests that the SEC could have learned from Japan’s response to the 2014 Mt. Gox hack and implemented similar regulations to protect investors.
  • He argues that audited collateral and segregation of funds requirements could have prevented the collapse of FTX and other crypto businesses.

Mark Cuban criticizes the SEC’s handling of the FTX-related crypto collapse, suggesting that Japan’s regulatory approach could have prevented the crisis.

Mark Cuban’s Critique of the SEC

Mark Cuban, a well-known billionaire and television personality, has publicly criticized the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its handling of the FTX-related crypto collapse in late 2022. Cuban argues that if the SEC had adopted a similar approach to Japan’s response to the 2014 Mt. Gox hack, the FTX issue might have been avoided. He believes that Japan’s regulatory approach, which prioritizes investor protection over personal political gain, could have been beneficial in the U.S. context.

The Need for Audited Collateral and Segregation of Funds

According to Cuban, the collapse of FTX and other crypto businesses could have been prevented if the SEC had managed to institute audited collateral and segregation of funds requirements. He also argues that other financial sectors present more risk to investors than the crypto industry. Cuban points out that even the most fraudulent crypto tokens have not resulted in as much financial loss as certain penny stocks. He suggests that the SEC has been ineffective at protecting investors from scams.

Cuban’s Belief in Crypto’s Utility

Despite his criticism of the SEC, Cuban remains a staunch believer in the utility of cryptocurrencies. He outlines several benefits of crypto, including lower cost of capital transfers, immediate collateralized loans, store of value, tokenization of assets, application and retention of royalties to digital assets, real-time, low-cost insurance markets, and cold storage ownership of significant assets to protect against theft.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Mark Cuban criticizes the SEC’s handling of the FTX-related crypto collapse, he remains optimistic about the potential of cryptocurrencies. His comments highlight the need for effective regulation to protect investors and ensure the stability of the crypto market.

DK

David Kim

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/1/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

1/31/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

1/30/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

1/29/2026