- The recent veto by President Biden of the contentious SAB 121 Bill has brought the American Bankers Association into the spotlight.
- Emerging evidence suggests the association had a significant influence on this decision.
- The veto has left many industry stakeholders wondering about the future implications.
President Biden’s rejection of SAB 121 has stirred discussions in the crypto community, with the American Bankers Association playing a pivotal role.
American Bankers Association Pushes Back Against SEC’s SAB 121
In a recent twist, it has come to light that the American Bankers Association (ABA) had a hand in urging President Joe Biden to veto the controversial SAB 121 Bill. The ABA reportedly dispatched an appeal highlighting significant concerns regarding the bill.
Key Components of H.J. Res.109
The ABA’s communication with the President involved advocating for H.J. Res.109 to be signed into law. H.J. Res.109 represents a bipartisan Congressional Review Act aimed at disapproving the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) “Staff Accounting Bulletin 121.” Prominent legislators like Senator Cynthia Lummis, Representative Mike Flood, and Representative Wiley Nickel have been vocal proponents of this resolution.
Bipartisan Efforts to Overturn SEC’s Mandate
Among the critical issues raised in opposition to SAB 121 is the requirement for financial institutions to record customers’ crypto assets on their balance sheets. Legislators including Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand, alongside Representatives like Patrick McHenry and Ritchie Torres, have rallied against this regulation, asserting it was enacted without proper consultation or public commentary.
Legislative Pushback and Strategic Moves
The SEC introduced SAB 121 in March 2022, a move that has been criticized for lacking transparency and bypassing standard regulatory procedures. This unilateral decision spurred legislative action, with key policymakers introducing H.J. Res.109 to counteract the SEC’s overreach. However, President Biden’s recent veto has complicated the legislative trajectory, prompting renewed debates and strategic efforts among lawmakers.
President Biden’s Veto and Its Ramifications
President Biden’s veto of H.J. Res.109 has not dampened the resolve of its supporters. Legislators are lobbying for a reconsideration, emphasizing the overwhelming bipartisan support for the resolution. The ABA has underscored that SAB 121 diverges significantly from traditional accounting practices for custodial assets and poses risks to the sound custody of digital assets by financial institutions.
Conclusion
In the wake of President Biden’s veto of SAB 121, the future remains uncertain for this controversial legislation. The American Bankers Association’s intervention highlights the complex interplay between financial regulation and legislative action. Moving forward, industry stakeholders and policymakers must navigate these regulatory challenges, balancing innovation in the crypto space with prudential oversight.
