- Recently, Justin Bons, the founder of Cyber Capital, made allegations on social media about the Sui (SUI) team, claiming that 85% of the SUI assets locked for staking were controlled by the team, posing a significant risk.
- Bons accused the project of centralization, sparking a heated debate.
- In response to Bons’ claims, the Sui team issued a statement, refuting the allegations and clarifying the situation.
In this article, we delve into the recent controversy surrounding the Sui (SUI) project, exploring the allegations made by Cyber Capital’s founder and the response from the Sui team.
Allegations by Cyber Capital’s Founder
Justin Bons, the founder of Cyber Capital, recently took to social media to voice his concerns about the Sui project. According to Bons, 85% of the SUI assets locked for staking are controlled by the team, a situation he believes poses a significant risk. Bons’ comments have sparked a heated debate, with many questioning the decentralization of the project.
Sui Team’s Response
In response to Bons’ allegations, the Sui team issued a statement, refuting the claims and providing clarification on the situation. The team referred to Bons’ comments as “misleading statements” and emphasized that contrary to his claims, the tokens are locked by third parties and cannot be moved until their lock periods expire. They further stated:
“The locked tokens are secured by third-party custodians. They cannot be moved and are securely held until their locks are released according to Sui’s token emission program. The founders of Mysten Labs do not control the Sui treasury, the community reserve, the stake subsidies, or any tokens allocated to investors. Furthermore, there is no mystery regarding token ownership. Every token to be released has been allocated.”
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding the Sui project serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and decentralization in the crypto space. While the Sui team has responded to the allegations, it remains to be seen how this situation will impact the project’s reputation and investor confidence in the long run.
