On October 18, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took formal steps to contest the recent ruling regarding XRP by Judge Analisa Torres. The agency’s appeal was filed through Form C to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, reigniting discussions over the classification of XRP sales by cryptocurrency exchanges as securities. Critical to this debate is the SEC’s challenge against the court’s decision, which notably absolved Ripple executives and scrutinized the non-cash distribution of XRP assets. The implications of this legal confrontation could alter the landscape of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States significantly.
Previously, on October 3, reports surfaced indicating that the SEC was pursuing an appeal regarding its earlier case against Ripple, asserting that the initial ruling contradicts established Supreme Court precedents related to securities law. An SEC representative emphasized the agency’s intent to elaborate on these points within the appellate framework. Historically, Ripple had faced a hefty $125 million civil penalty, a considerable reduction from the $2 billion sought by the SEC, showcasing the nuanced nature of regulatory actions in the evolving crypto ecosystem.