Massive $70M Loss in Bitcoin (BTC) Crypto Scam: Unraveling the Latest Cryptocurrency Fraud

BTC

BTC/USDT

$71,354.77
+3.55%
24h Volume

$17,366,629,629.18

24h H/L

$71,554.95 / $68,531.50

Change: $3,023.45 (4.41%)

Long/Short
65.5%
Long: 65.5%Short: 34.5%
Funding Rate

-0.0023%

Shorts pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
Bitcoin
Bitcoin
Daily

$71,351.87

2.98%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$79,008.03
Resistance 2$75,548.63
Resistance 1$72,179.52
Price$71,351.87
Support 1$70,589.27
Support 2$67,300.00
Support 3$62,909.86
Pivot (PP):$70,598.27
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):35.3
(03:25 AM UTC)
2 min read

Contents

1452 views
0 comments
  • A recent cyber attack on a cryptocurrency investor resulted in a substantial financial loss of $70 million in Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC).
  • The incident unfolded over a span of six hours and had a profound impact on the crypto market.
  • Lookonchain, a blockchain analytics platform, first reported this event after detecting unusual activity linked to a newly created crypto address.

A cryptocurrency investor loses $70 million in WBTC due to a cyber attack, highlighting the need for heightened security measures in digital asset transactions.

How Was the Crypto Investor Scammed?

The affected investor had set up a new wallet address and transferred a small amount of Ethereum to it, a common practice among crypto owners to manage transaction fees in the decentralized finance sector. Unbeknownst to them, a scammer had replicated a similar-looking address, capturing only the first and last few characters, making it appear legitimate. This deceptive similarity led the investor to mistakenly send approximately $71 million worth of WBTC to the fraudster’s address.

What Techniques Did the Scammer Use?

The scammer employed a strategy known as an address attack, where they create a wallet address that closely mimics the intended recipient’s address. By making a nominal transfer to the investor, which appeared in their transaction history, the scammer set the stage for the error. Many wallet interfaces do not display full addresses, which contributed to the investor’s costly mistake.

User-Usable Inferences

  • Verify full wallet addresses during transactions, not just the beginning and end.
  • Use wallet applications that display complete addresses to avoid similar scams.
  • Regularly update and review security practices for handling large transactions.

Conclusion

The loss of such a significant amount of WBTC not only affected the investor but also sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency community, highlighting the vulnerabilities associated with digital asset transactions. This event serves as a crucial reminder for crypto investors to exercise heightened vigilance and adopt robust security measures when managing their digital assets.

DK

David Kim

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/9/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

2/8/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

2/7/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

2/6/2026