13-year-old Bitcoin wallet movements show an early-era stash of 312 BTC—sent in 2012 and now worth over $35 million. Tracking data shows a 132.03 BTC split and a 5 BTC transfer to Kraken, confirming that long-dormant addresses from Bitcoin’s early days can still move large sums.
-
Old-wallet movement: 312 BTC received in 2012, now valued at ~ $35M
-
This week the wallet split 132.03 BTC to a new address and 5 BTC to Kraken; 307.79 BTC remained untouched.
-
Original receipts in 2012 averaged $12.22 per BTC — a price appreciation exceeding 640,000%.
Meta description: 13-year-old Bitcoin wallet moves 312 BTC, worth over $35M today — analysis of the transfers and tracking methods. Read COINOTAG’s quick breakdown now.
What happened with the 13-year-old Bitcoin wallet?
The 13-year-old Bitcoin wallet transferred portions of a 312 BTC balance first received in 2012. The move split 132.03 BTC to a new address and sent 5 BTC to Kraken, while most coins remained. Blockchain tracking confirms this was an early-era wallet active when Satoshi-era participants and experimental services dominated usage.
How much was the original 312 BTC worth then and now?
In 2012 the address received 312 BTC at an average price of $12.22 per coin, valuing the stash at approximately $5,400. At current market rates the same 312 BTC are valued at over $35 million, reflecting more than a 640,000% gain since acquisition.

Source: Arkham
How did trackers verify the movement and origin?
Blockchain intelligence firms identified the wallet by on-chain heuristics and historical transaction patterns. Analysts matched early inputs and outputs to addresses known to be active in 2012, confirming the wallet’s age and its association with early network activity.
Why is this move significant to markets and researchers?
Movements from decade-old wallets can signal profit-taking, reallocation, or custodial consolidation. For researchers, these transactions provide rare windows into early distribution and holder behavior, helping refine models of long-term supply dynamics.
When did the transfers occur and what were the amounts?
The transfers occurred this week: 132.03 BTC (≈ $15.6M) moved to a new address, 5 BTC (≈ $570k) were routed to Kraken, while 307.79 BTC remained in the original cluster. Whale trackers initially flagged three awakenings that later were linked to the same wallet group.
Comparative snapshot: 2012 vs today
Metric | 2012 | Today (current market) |
---|---|---|
BTC received | 312 BTC | 312 BTC |
Average price | $12.22 | Market rate (approx.) |
Estimated value | ~ $5,400 | ~ $35,000,000+ |
Notable moves | — | 132.03 BTC split; 5 BTC to Kraken |
How do analysts track century-old Bitcoin wallets?
Analysts use transaction graph analysis, clustering heuristics, and historical input/output matching to connect addresses. They cross-reference timestamp patterns, fee structures, and known service addresses to reduce false positives.
What does this tell investors about long-term holders?
Large dormant holdings that move occasionally indicate varied behavior: redistribution, custodial actions, or selective sales. Such movements can temporarily affect short-term liquidity but do not change the long-term supply held by HODLers unless selling pressure increases.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was this wallet linked to early services like SatoshiDice?
Transaction history shows activity consistent with early network usage, including interactions with developer addresses and experimental platforms often seen in 2012. Direct attributions to specific services remain uncertain without additional evidence.
Did the Kraken transfer indicate a sale?
A 5 BTC transfer to Kraken is a deposit to an exchange but does not confirm an executed sale. Exchange deposits can precede trades, custodial consolidation, or internal transfers. Only on-exchange trade data would confirm a sale.
Key Takeaways
- Early-era stash reawakened: A 312 BTC wallet from 2012 moved funds this week, highlighting dormant-holder activity.
- Partial split and exchange deposit: 132.03 BTC routed to a new address; 5 BTC sent to Kraken, while most coins remained.
- Supply and research value: Such moves offer insights into long-term holder behavior and can temporarily influence liquidity metrics.
Conclusion
This 13-year-old Bitcoin wallet movement underlines that early-era holders still control significant supply. COINOTAG’s analysis shows selective splitting and a small exchange deposit, not a full liquidation. Watch on-chain flows and exchange data for confirmation of any material market impact.