-
ETF issuers VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Capital have formally urged the SEC to reinstate the “first-to-file” principle, emphasizing its critical role in fostering innovation and fair competition within the crypto ETF market.
-
The companies argue that abandoning this method discourages pioneering product development and undermines investor choice, potentially stalling the evolution of digital asset investment vehicles.
-
According to a joint letter obtained by COINOTAG, the issuers warn that the current SEC approach “fundamentally undermines the commission’s mission of protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation.”
VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Capital call on the SEC to restore the first-to-file rule for crypto ETFs, highlighting its importance for innovation and market fairness.
SEC’s Departure from First-to-File Principle Raises Concerns Among Crypto ETF Issuers
The recent letter to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) from prominent ETF issuers VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Capital underscores a growing tension between regulatory practices and market innovation. Historically, the SEC’s first-to-file principle ensured that ETF applications were reviewed and approved in the order they were submitted, incentivizing issuers to innovate and compete fairly. However, with the advent of crypto ETFs, this principle has been sidelined, leading to concerns about reduced competition and innovation stagnation.
The issuers argue that the current approach rewards “lazy behavior” by allowing later applicants to leapfrog earlier filings, which diminishes the incentive to develop pioneering products. This shift, they contend, not only limits investor choice but also compromises market efficiency and the SEC’s core mission to maintain orderly markets and facilitate capital formation. The letter highlights that regulatory frameworks should actively support entrepreneurship and creativity to sustain the United States’ global leadership in financial innovation.
Impact of Regulatory Shifts on Crypto ETF Market Dynamics
The suspension of the first-to-file rule has coincided with a surge in digital asset ETF filings, particularly following the inauguration of former President Donald Trump, when market participants anticipated a more favorable regulatory environment. Yet, the SEC’s recent delays and selective approvals have introduced uncertainty into the market. For instance, decisions on altcoin and staking ETFs have been postponed, including Grayscale’s spot Solana (SOL) Trust ETF, which saw its approval deadline extended to October.
These delays reflect the SEC’s cautious stance amid growing institutional interest in diversified crypto investment products. Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart noted that the SEC typically utilizes the full timeframe allowed for reviewing filings, making early approvals rare. This procedural norm further complicates the timeline for new crypto ETFs entering the market, affecting both issuers and investors.
SEC’s Scrutiny of Staking and Altcoin ETFs Highlights Regulatory Challenges
Beyond procedural delays, the SEC has raised substantive concerns regarding the structural qualifications of certain crypto ETFs. The recent response to the effective registration statements for the REX-Osprey staked ETFs exemplifies this scrutiny. The regulator questioned whether these investment vehicles meet the criteria to be classified as ETFs, citing the underlying fund’s business structure as a potential disqualifier.
This regulatory pushback has delayed the launch of staking ETFs, despite market expectations of imminent product availability. The SEC’s rigorous evaluation process underscores the complexity of integrating innovative crypto products within existing regulatory frameworks, balancing investor protection with market development.
Broader Implications for Financial Innovation and Investor Protection
The debate over the first-to-file principle and the SEC’s cautious approach to crypto ETFs reflect broader challenges in regulating emerging financial technologies. ETF issuers emphasize that clear, consistent, and innovation-friendly regulatory policies are essential to maintain the United States’ competitive edge in global financial markets. At the same time, regulators must ensure that new products meet stringent standards to protect investors and uphold market integrity.
As the crypto ETF landscape evolves, ongoing dialogue between issuers and regulators will be critical. The call from VanEck, 21Shares, and Canary Capital serves as a reminder that regulatory frameworks must adapt to support both innovation and investor confidence.
Conclusion
The push by leading ETF issuers for the SEC to reinstate the first-to-file principle highlights a pivotal moment in the regulation of crypto investment products. Maintaining this principle could enhance innovation incentives, promote fair competition, and expand investor choice in the rapidly growing crypto ETF market. Meanwhile, the SEC’s thorough review process reflects the complexities of integrating novel financial instruments within established regulatory paradigms. Stakeholders should closely monitor these developments, as the balance struck between innovation and regulation will shape the future trajectory of crypto ETFs in the United States.
