-
Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss has publicly accused JPMorgan and other major banks of attempting to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) Open Banking Rule, a move that could stifle fintech innovation and consumer data rights.
-
Winklevoss warns that these efforts threaten the viability of fintech companies that facilitate seamless fiat-to-crypto transactions, potentially undermining the United States’ position as a leader in crypto innovation.
-
Kraken’s co-CEO Arjun Sethi echoed these concerns, highlighting that Wall Street’s push for data access fees represents a strategic attempt to control and monetize consumer data, which could fragment the open financial ecosystem.
Tyler Winklevoss accuses JPMorgan of undermining the Open Banking Rule, risking fintech bankruptcies and US crypto leadership; Kraken’s Arjun Sethi warns of Wall Street’s control over data access.
JPMorgan’s Challenge to the Open Banking Rule Threatens Consumer Data Access and Crypto Innovation
The Open Banking Rule, established under Section 1033 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act, grants consumers the right to access and share their financial data securely through third-party applications such as Plaid. This framework has been pivotal in enabling fintech platforms to connect users’ bank accounts with crypto exchanges, facilitating easy fiat-to-crypto conversions.
However, major banks including JPMorgan are reportedly contesting this rule through legal channels, seeking to impose fees and restrictions on data sharing. Tyler Winklevoss views this as a direct assault on consumer choice and the broader crypto ecosystem.
He emphasized that such restrictions could bankrupt fintech companies that rely on open data access to provide seamless services, thereby hindering user adoption of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin.
Winklevoss further argued that this opposition runs counter to national ambitions to position the United States as a global hub for crypto and financial innovation, urging stakeholders to actively resist these efforts.
Wall Street’s Data Monetization Strategy: A Barrier to Open Financial Systems
Arjun Sethi, co-CEO of Kraken, has criticized JPMorgan’s proposed fees for data access as a strategic move to monetize consumer data rather than a genuine technological advancement. He warned that turning data access into a revenue stream incentivizes fragmentation and lock-in, which fundamentally limits innovation.
Sethi highlighted that this approach contrasts sharply with the principles of open finance and decentralized networks, where data accessibility and interoperability are foundational.
He stated, “This is not a technical innovation. It is a toll. And once data becomes a revenue stream for the infrastructure provider, the incentive is to fragment it, lock it in, and sell it at margin.”
Crypto Networks Offer a Model for Open, Permissionless Data Access
In contrast to traditional financial institutions, crypto networks operate on public ledgers that provide permissionless access, cryptographic identity verification, and open, composable codebases. Smart contracts execute transparently across all participants, ensuring equitable data availability without intermediaries.
Sethi explained that in crypto systems, access to data is intrinsic to the network architecture rather than a negotiated privilege, enabling developers to build interoperable applications without restrictions.
He cautioned, however, that the crypto industry must remain vigilant against replicating centralized power structures that could erode its foundational ethos of openness and decentralization.
To preserve its transformative potential, the sector should focus on investing in shared protocols and infrastructure that promote open access and composability, rather than merely extracting value through proprietary platforms.
Political and Industry Support for Open Banking and Crypto Innovation
Winklevoss’ concerns have resonated within the crypto community and beyond, drawing support from influential figures such as US Senator Cynthia Lummis, who has publicly endorsed the protection of open banking principles.
This political backing underscores the broader recognition of open data access as a critical component for fostering innovation and maintaining competitive advantage in the global financial landscape.
Industry leaders and lawmakers alike are increasingly advocating for regulatory frameworks that balance consumer protection with the need to sustain an open and innovative fintech ecosystem.
Conclusion
The ongoing legal and regulatory battles surrounding the Open Banking Rule highlight a pivotal moment for the future of fintech and crypto innovation in the United States. Tyler Winklevoss and Arjun Sethi’s critiques illuminate the risks posed by entrenched financial institutions seeking to control consumer data access through restrictive measures.
Preserving open data access is essential not only for protecting consumer rights but also for enabling the seamless integration of traditional finance with emerging crypto technologies. As the industry navigates these challenges, collaboration between regulators, fintech innovators, and policymakers will be crucial to fostering an open, competitive, and innovative financial ecosystem.
Stakeholders are encouraged to stay informed and engaged in this evolving landscape to support policies that uphold transparency, accessibility, and innovation in financial services.
