Aster-Fueled Binance Chain Appears to Surpass Hyperliquid in 24-Hour Perpetual Volume

• Binance Chain perps volume reached $21.6B, overtaking Hyperliquid’s $10.7B.

• Aster’s native token surged ~41.4% in 24 hours, market cap now ~$3.9B (CoinGecko data reported).

• Hyperliquid maintains a dominant 30-day perps market share at $326.77B versus Binance’s $60.12B.

Meta description: Aster DEX drives Binance Chain perps volume to $21.6B, overtaking Hyperliquid; read key data, market impact, and next steps for traders. Stay informed.

What is driving Binance Chain perps volume growth?

Binance Chain perps volume growth is being driven by the rapid adoption of Aster DEX, strategic integrations with the Binance ecosystem, and planned validator proposals to cut gas fees and speed blocks. These factors combine to lure liquidity and short-term speculative flows toward BSC-based decentralized exchanges.

How significant is Aster DEX’s contribution compared to Hyperliquid?

Data shows Binance Chain’s 24-hour perpetual volume at $21.6 billion, surpassing Hyperliquid’s $10.7 billion (data sources cited: Dune Analytics). At the DEX level, CoinGecko figures put Hyperliquid’s 24-hour trading at $609 million and Aster at $583 million, highlighting strong but still competitive platform-level activity.

Why did Aster’s token spike and what does it mean?

Aster’s native token jumped roughly 41.4% in 24 hours, lifting its market cap to about $3.9 billion (CoinGecko reported). Rapid token appreciation often reflects speculation on network growth, liquidity mining incentives, and prominent endorsements that increase visibility and trading activity.

What role do validator proposals and gas fees play?

Validators on BNB Chain proposed cutting transaction fees from 0.1 gwei to 0.05 gwei and accelerating block intervals from 750 ms to 450 ms. Lower fees and faster finality reduce trading friction and can reallocate order flow to cheaper, faster chains — a strategic lever to keep BSC competitive.

How does long-term market share compare between Binance Chain and Hyperliquid?

While Binance Chain’s 24-hour perps volume spike is notable, Hyperliquid’s 30-day perpetual volume remains dominant at $326.77 billion versus Binance’s $60.12 billion. That gap implies Hyperliquid retains longer-term liquidity depth even as BSC gains short-term momentum.

What are market signals and expert perspectives?

Cecilia Hsueh, Chief Strategy Officer at MEXC, said: “The recent surge in BSC perpetual volumes and DEX activity is not merely a passing phase.” She highlighted technical upgrades, incentive programs, and Binance ecosystem integration as key durability factors. Prediction markets on Myriad (a platform by DASTAN) show mixed forecasts for Aster’s near-term price ceiling.

Gas fees matter. They decide where traders build, where liquidity flows, and where innovation happens. That’s why validators on BNB Chain are proposing to halve fees and accelerate block speeds, keeping BNB Smart Chain (BSC) competitive with the fastest chains in crypto.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much volume did Binance Chain record in 24 hours?

Binance Chain recorded $21.6 billion in 24-hour perpetual trading volume, surpassing Hyperliquid’s $10.7 billion, based on Dune Analytics data cited in market reports.

Is Aster now larger than Hyperliquid by market cap?

No. Aster’s market cap (~$3.9B) is below Hyperliquid’s HYPE market cap (~$12.1B). Volume spikes do not immediately translate into larger market cap or sustained dominance.

Key Takeaways

• Short-term surge: Aster helped Binance Chain reach $21.6B in 24-hour perps volume, overtaking Hyperliquid’s $10.7B.
• Depth still favors Hyperliquid: Hyperliquid leads on 30-day perps volume and overall liquidity depth.
• What traders should watch: Validator fee proposals, token incentive programs, and 30-day volume trends to gauge durability.

Conclusion

Binance Chain’s recent perps volume breakout, catalyzed by Aster DEX, highlights how fee economics, ecosystem integration, and token momentum can quickly reshape trading flows. While Aster’s rise is meaningful, Hyperliquid’s multi-week liquidity lead remains substantial. Traders and liquidity providers should monitor fee proposals, incentive timelines, and 30-day volume metrics to determine whether this shift endures.

Published: 2025-09-24 · Updated: 2025-09-24 · Author: COINOTAG Editorial