Bitcoin Dominance Retesting 100‑Week EMA Near 57.96% Could Precede Altseason, Analysts Say

• Bitcoin dominance at 57.96% is testing the 100‑week EMA — a historical cycle pivot.

• Analysts warn a break below the EMA may trigger altcoin rotation, with downside targets around 50% and 42%.

• Analyst Wimar noted the market entering a bullish phase historically aligned with altcoins rising 20x–50x.

Bitcoin dominance 100 week EMA retest at 57.96% — monitor for Altseason triggers and trade signals; read the outlook and key targets.

Bitcoin dominance retests the 100 week EMA at 57.96%, a level that has historically led to major market cycle shifts.

What does Bitcoin dominance retesting the 100 week EMA mean?

Bitcoin dominance retesting the 100‑week EMA means the market is at a historically significant technical threshold. If dominance holds above the EMA, BTC may retain market share; if it breaks below, capital often rotates into altcoins, increasing the likelihood of Altseason within weeks to months.

How could a break below the 100 week EMA trigger Altseason?

A break below the 100‑week EMA typically signals reduced relative demand for Bitcoin. Historically, such breaks coincided with accelerated inflows into Ethereum and smaller cap altcoins. Targets based on prior cycles include ~50% and a deeper move to ~42% dominance. Risk-managed positions are recommended.

Historical patterns: How has the 100 week EMA behaved previously?

The 100‑week EMA has been a recurrent boundary for Bitcoin dominance since 2019. When dominance pierced the EMA in June 2019 it preceded prolonged BTC accumulation. Conversely, breaks below the EMA in mid‑2020 and early 2021 aligned with sharp declines and the start of altcoin rallies.

After the early 2021 break, Altseason followed as smaller assets outperformed Bitcoin. Momentum reversed in March 2023 when dominance climbed back above the EMA, culminating in a 2024 peak near 66%.

Current market setup: When does this test become decisive?

Dominance at 57.96% is within the EMA band and requires a clear directional close to be decisive. A weekly close below the EMA increases probability of sustained altcoin outperformance. Conversely, a reclaim above recent highs would support further Bitcoin consolidation above 60% dominance.

Analyst Alex Clay highlights that decisive moves at this level have historically aligned with broad cycle shifts. Analyst Wimar added that the market has entered a highly bullish phase, historically tied to substantial altcoin returns.

Analysts: What outcomes are being considered?

Analysts outline two primary scenarios: 1) Hold above EMA — Bitcoin retains or increases market share (target: >60%); 2) Break below EMA — capital rotates into altcoins (targets: ~50% and ~42%). These projections are based on prior cycle amplitudes and observed market rotations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will a break below the 100 week EMA cause Altseason?

Historically, a weekly break below the EMA often preceded amplified altcoin performance. If dominance breaks below the EMA, expect accelerated rotation into Ethereum and smaller caps, with downside dominance targets around 50% and 42%.

How fast can dominance move after a break?

Dominance moves can occur over several weeks to a few months. Past cycles show shifts from EMA breakout to target zones in 4–12 weeks, depending on liquidity and macro conditions.

Key Takeaways

• Critical level: Bitcoin dominance is retesting the 100‑week EMA at 57.96%, a historical cycle pivot.
• Two scenarios: Hold above EMA → BTC retains or grows market share; break below → rotation to altcoins with targets ~50% and ~42%.
• Actionable insight: Wait for weekly confirmation, scale alt exposure on confirmed rotation, and use risk controls.

Conclusion

Bitcoin dominance at 57.96% is testing a long‑tested technical boundary that has repeatedly dictated market cycles. Monitor weekly closes around the 100‑week EMA for decisive signals. Traders and investors should prepare for either sustained BTC control or an accelerating Altseason and adjust exposure with disciplined risk management.