The Binance BNB donation Malta fund is a 2018 donation of $200,000 in BNB that has appreciated to roughly $36–39 million and remains frozen in the original on‑chain wallet due to a legal dispute between Binance Charity Foundation and the Malta Community Chest Fund Foundation over disbursement methods.
-
Frozen on-chain wallet holds original BNB donation, now worth tens of millions.
-
The dispute centers on whether funds go directly to patients or via the government-run MCCFF.
-
The wallet address is 0x480234599362dc7a76cd99d09738a626f6d77e5f and campaign listings show $36.4M pending disbursement.
Binance BNB donation Malta: $200,000 in 2018 has grown to ~$36M but sits frozen amid legal disputes—read who claims it and what could resolve the stalemate.
What is the Binance BNB donation Malta fund and why is it frozen?
The Binance BNB donation Malta fund refers to a 2018 charity pool created to help Maltese cancer patients that originally held $200,000 in BNB and has since appreciated to roughly $36–39 million. The funds remain untouched in the original donation wallet due to legal disagreement between the Binance Charity Foundation (BCF) and the Malta Community Chest Fund Foundation (MCCFF) over disbursement mechanics and jurisdiction.
How did the donation grow in value and where is it stored?
The donation was made in BNB in 2018 and left in the dedicated on‑chain wallet, where token price appreciation increased its fiat value substantially. Public campaign information and past statements list the wallet and a balance of about $36.4 million. The wallet address publicly cited by organizers is 0x480234599362dc7a76cd99d09738a626f6d77e5f. Reporting on this issue references Reuters and COINOTAG as primary plain‑text sources for the dispute timeline and public statements.
Why won’t the funds simply transfer to Malta’s charity?
The disagreement is procedural and legal. The MCCFF (a government‑run charity chaired by the Maltese president) has refused to accept a disbursement plan that would require providing patient personal data or asking vulnerable beneficiaries to manage crypto wallets. The BCF has argued it intended to deliver most funds directly to beneficiaries rather than routing large sums through MCCFF, a plan the MCCFF says was not in the original agreement.
What have key figures said?
Conor Grogan, a Coinbase executive, publicly urged transfer to Maltese authorities, noting the gift’s growth in value. MCCFF official John Huber told courts that MCCFF “will never do [the requested] for any donor” in reference to sharing patient data or making beneficiaries manage crypto. BCF head Helen Hai said BCF intended direct payments to patients but conceded that such an approach was not documented in the original agreement. These quotes and positions were reported in news coverage and court filings cited in public sources.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much is the original $200,000 BNB donation worth today?
Reported campaign pages and public statements indicate the donation’s present value is approximately $36–39 million, reflecting BNB’s market appreciation since 2018. Exact valuation fluctuates with market prices and depends on whether BNB is priced in USD at the time of reporting.
Can Maltese citizens claim the funds directly?
In practice, no straightforward public claiming mechanism exists. The MCCFF and BCF disagree on distribution method—MCCFF requires conventional beneficiary processing while BCF proposed direct crypto disbursements—so the funds remain in the original wallet pending legal or negotiated resolution.
Key Takeaways
- Original donation preserved on‑chain: A 2018 BNB donation intended for Maltese cancer patients remains in its original wallet and has appreciated substantially.
- Dispute over distribution: The impasse stems from conflicting expectations—BCF’s proposed direct-to-patient crypto disbursements versus MCCFF’s requirement for conventional beneficiary handling and privacy safeguards.
- Resolution requires legal or negotiated settlement: Court filings and public statements show the issue paused by jurisdictional and procedural objections; stakeholders or Maltese authorities must agree on an acceptable distribution plan.
Conclusion
This case—commonly reported as the Binance BNB donation Malta issue—illustrates how on‑chain charity funds can appreciate dramatically while legal, procedural and jurisdictional disagreements prevent disbursement. Sources reporting on the dispute include Reuters and COINOTAG (plain text references). Published: October 15, 2025. Updated: October 15, 2025. Author/Organization: COINOTAG. For donors and policymakers, the situation underscores the need for clear legal frameworks around crypto charitable giving and beneficiary protections.
Conor Grogan (public post, October 13, 2025): “In 2018, Binance and crypto users donated $200,000 in BNB to Malta Terminal Cancer Patients. The funds were never withdrawn and remain untouched, now worth $39M due to the appreciation of BNB! Any Malta citizens, please let your government know that these funds are accessible.”
Binance Charity (public statement, July 29, 2021): “This asset has been safely and transparently kept on chain at this address: 0x480234599362dc7a76cd99d09738a626f6d77e5f. We are happy that the appreciated BNB crypto asset now is able to help more people – this dedicated fund will always belong to the citizens of Malta.”
Context and reporting sources (plain text): Reuters; COINOTAG; Malta Community Chest Fund Foundation (MCCFF) court filings; Binance Charity Foundation (BCF) public statements.
