Bybit’s Ethereum Reserves Surpass 200K ETH After Hack: Signs of Market Recovery and Cautious Sentiment

• Bybit’s Ethereum reserves have witnessed a remarkable rebound past 200,000 ETH following a significant hack, suggesting a potential recovery within the market.

• Amidst recovery signs, market sentiment remains mixed as traders adjust to new developments post-hack, highlighting an ongoing phase of uncertainty.

• “The rebound suggested that Bybit actively replenished its ETH holdings to meet liquidity demands and restore market confidence,” a source from COINOTAG noted.

This article explores Bybit’s recovery in Ethereum reserves post-hack and the implications for market sentiment and future price movements of ETH.

Bybit Replenishes ETH Holdings: A Sign of Strength?

A detailed examination of the Ethereum Exchange Reserve chart for Bybit indicates a sharp decline in reserves following the hack on February 21, 2025.

Before the event, Bybit held a substantial 443,691 ETH. Within just an hour post-hack, reserves plummeted to 39,692 ETH, showcasing immediate market reactions.

As of February 23, 2025, Bybit’s Ethereum reserves had climbed back above 200,000 ETH, signaling a steady yet gradual recovery in market confidence.

Source: CryptoQuant

This rebounding trend indicates that Bybit is not only replenishing its ETH reserves to satisfy liquidity needs but also striving to restore trader confidence in the platform.

The recovery of these reserves is often correlated with past instances where exchange rebounds led to subsequent price stabilization in the market.

Capital Flow Shifts: Is Confidence Returning?

Further analysis of Ethereum’s netflow data suggests signs of market stabilization. On February 21, 2025, Bybit’s netflow fell to -6.6K ETH, reflecting widespread panic selling and withdrawals triggered by the hack.

On February 23, the netflow showed signs of recovery, marked by a steady increase in inflows that countered previous outflows.

Source: CryptoQuant

This positive shift in netflows resonates with the earlier recovery of exchange reserves, underscoring efforts by Bybit to stabilize ETH levels and enhance market liquidity.

Historically, recoveries in netflows post-major disruptions often precede price stabilization, providing some reassurance to traders amidst ongoing volatility.

However, negative Funding Rates along with macroeconomic uncertainties continue to cast shadows over market stability.

Market Sentiment Wavers

The prevailing analysis of Ethereum’s Funding Rate indicates a trend of increased selling pressure as rates turned negative after the hack.

This adjustment reflects a shift in trading behavior driven by fear, with sellers notably shorting ETH to capitalize on perceived uncertainties.

Source: CryptoQuant

Typically, significant declines in Funding Rates can lead to periods of sideways price action or increased volatility, particularly if major resistance levels are not surpassed.

In this context, ETH has struggled to maintain momentum near the $3,000 resistance level, indicating a potential stagnation in the market.

The reaction observed aligns with past incidents where hacks prompted short-term price liquidation and subsequent consolidation challenges.

Until we see a stabilization in Funding Rates or positive catalysts, ETH’s price volatility remains a prominent concern.

Are Institutions Hedging or Accumulating?

The CME Ethereum Futures Open Interest (OI) chart provides a glimpse into institutional sentiment, peaking at $3.26B on February 24, 2025, as ETH traded around $2,819.69.

Source: Coinglass

This increase indicates that institutional traders may be positioning themselves strategically, potentially hedging against further declines in the asset’s value.

The link between CME OI and exchange reserves enriches the market perspective. While Bybit’s ETH reserves and netflows recover, institutions are retaining a watchful stance, weighing recovery optimism against volatility challenges.

In summary, Bybit’s rebounds in Ethereum reserves and netflow signal a phase of stabilization in the market; however, negative Funding Rates and cautious institutional movements imply ongoing uncertainty in pricing trends.

The trajectory of ETH’s market direction will heavily depend on the stabilization of Funding Rates and the management of selling pressures that could drive ETH further into lower support territories.

Conclusion

The recovery of Bybit’s Ethereum reserves and netflow following the hack showcases potential market stabilization. However, ongoing negative signals from Funding Rates and the cautious approach of institutional players highlight the complexities of market dynamics. Clarifying trends in funding and market confidence will be crucial to understanding future movements.