Congressional Hearing Questions Trump’s World Liberty Financial Over Potential Subsidies Linked to USD1 Stablecoin Deal

• The recent congressional hearing has unveiled potential conflicts of interest surrounding President Trump’s crypto-related firm, World Liberty Financial (WLFI).

• Lawmakers scrutinized a $2 billion no-interest deal that could substantially benefit Trump’s affiliated cryptocurrency, raising questions about financial transparency.

• A documented quote from Rep. Brad Sherman highlights the concern: “Is this interest‑free loan of $2 billion worth $80 million every year to WLFI and its Trump owners?”

In a controversial congressional hearing, lawmakers questioned the financial implications of Trump’s crypto firm, spotlighting conflicts of interest and potential subsidies.

Congressional Hearing Draws Attention to Trump’s Crypto Activities

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faced tough questions from the House Financial Services Committee regarding the operations of World Liberty Financial, a company deeply connected to former President Trump. Founded in 2024, WLFI claims to have raised approximately $550 million through its governance token, amidst significant political scrutiny.

In March, WLFI launched its new stablecoin, USD1, which is pegged to the U.S. dollar and supported by U.S. Treasuries and cash equivalents. Just weeks after its launch, the firm announced a $2 billion deployment of USD1 by Abu Dhabi’s state-backed MGX. This agreement has catapulted USD1 to the forefront of the stablecoin market by capitalizing on its substantial market cap.

Rep. Brad Sherman emphasized the financial implications of this arrangement, suggesting that, based on a typical market interest rate of 4%, the no-interest loan effectively acts as an $80 million annual subsidy to Trump and his company’s interests.

As Sherman articulated, “Abu Dhabi just announced that they were going to give $2 billion to a stablecoin put forward by World Liberty Financial, and it pays no interest.” This raises alarming questions about whether such arrangements could fall under hidden financial support favoring politically connected individuals.

Concerns Regarding Transparency and Policy Influence

Bessent has so far maintained that no regulations prohibit such arrangements from being considered hidden subsidies, despite the lawmakers’ urgent call for regulatory clarity. The concern is that this financial structure could obscure potential political favors, prompting lawmakers to press for comprehensive disclosures regarding stablecoin frameworks.

Investigative reports, including one by the New York Times, have indicated several concerning aspects surrounding WLFI, such as undisclosed multimillion-dollar “endorsements” and financial arrangements benefiting foreign entities. This brings to light the firm’s unprecedented blurring of lines between commerce and governmental policymaking.

Legislative Proposals on the Horizon

In light of these revelations, Democratic lawmakers have indicated plans to introduce legislation aimed at enforcing mandatory expense-ratio disclosures for stablecoins. This initiative also includes proposals to prohibit no-interest financial structures characterized as effective subsidies.

Such measures are crucial to establish much-needed transparency in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape, especially when politically intertwined firms are at play.

Conclusion

The ongoing scrutiny of World Liberty Financial highlights the imperative for greater regulatory oversight in cryptocurrency markets, particularly concerning entities with political connections. As Congress debates the ramifications of these financial arrangements, transparency and integrity in governmental dealings are more critical than ever. These discussions will likely influence not only the future of WLFI but the regulatory landscape for the entire cryptocurrency sector.