Critical SEC Decision on Gary Gensler’s SAB 121 Policy: Potential Impact on Bitcoin (BTC) and Crypto Market

BTC

BTC/USDT

$71,354.77
+3.55%
24h Volume

$17,366,629,629.18

24h H/L

$71,554.95 / $68,531.50

Change: $3,023.45 (4.41%)

Long/Short
65.5%
Long: 65.5%Short: 34.5%
Funding Rate

-0.0023%

Shorts pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
Bitcoin
Bitcoin
Daily

$71,351.87

2.98%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$79,008.03
Resistance 2$75,548.63
Resistance 1$72,179.52
Price$71,351.87
Support 1$70,589.27
Support 2$67,300.00
Support 3$62,909.86
Pivot (PP):$70,598.27
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):35.3
(06:15 PM UTC)
3 min read

Contents

1316 views
0 comments
  • SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s SAB 121 policy is awaiting a major decision this week as the House of Representatives is gearing up to decide on the revocation of this regulation.
  • Rep. Mike Flood is advocating for the revocation of the SAB 121 policy.
  • The SAB 121 regulation, spearheaded by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, is seen as an obstacle for the crypto community.

The fate of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bill (SAB) 121 hangs in the balance as the House of Representatives prepares for a decisive vote. The proposed repeal, led by Representative Mike Flood, could significantly impact digital asset regulation.

The House To Decide On Repeal Of Gary Gensler’s SAB 121

Rep. Flood is fervently advocating for the passage of H.J. Res. 109. In a post on X, Flood revealed that the House is going to vote on whether to pass the repeal of SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s SAB 121 policy. Furthermore, he declared, “It’s time to pass H.J. Res. 109! #RepealSAB121,” setting the stage for a contentious showdown within the House of Representatives.

SAB 121 and Its Impact on the Crypto Community

SAB 121, enacted in April 2022, mandates digital asset custodians to report liabilities and corresponding assets for all custodied cryptocurrencies on their balance sheets. The measure, spearheaded by SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, aims to mitigate the “significant risks and uncertainties associated with safeguarding crypto assets.” However, Committee members Mike Flood and Wiley Nickel argue that SAB 121’s implementation circumvented proper protocol. Moreover, Rep. Flood underscored the oversight in the issuance process, stating, “The SEC issued SAB 121 without conferring with the prudential regulators who are the experts on regulating bank custody.”

House Of Financial Services Passes Resolution

Amidst the fervent debate, proponents of the resolution contend that SAB 121 encourages consumer protection measures. Rep. Maxine Waters, a staunch advocate for regulatory safeguards, asserted, “Efforts like SAB 121 help prevent fraud.” Citing the collapse of FTX as a cautionary tale, Rep. Waters underscored the imperative of safeguarding investor interests against potential mishandling of crypto assets by custodians. However, on February 29, the resolution, emerging victorious in a narrow committee vote of 31-20 in the House of Financial Services, garnered support from both sides of the aisle. Notable Democratic proponents include Reps. Wiley Nickel, Ritchie Torres, and Josh Gottheimer, underscoring the bipartisan nature of the contentious issue.

Conclusion

The battle for the survival of the SEC’s SAB 121 is far from over. The resolution faces the formidable hurdle of securing approval in both the House and the Senate before the policy can be effectively discarded. This decision could have far-reaching implications for the crypto community and the future of digital asset regulation.

SC

Sarah Chen

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/9/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

2/8/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

2/7/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

2/6/2026