Ethereum Researcher Proposes Solution to Democratize Block Proposing and Potentially Eliminate MEV Issues

• Ethereum’s latest proposal aims to address the centralization of its block producing process while mitigating Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) concerns.

• A well-known Ethereum researcher, *Malik672*, suggests that implementing a “shared random algorithm” could democratize block building and enhance transaction propagation.

• “This system flips that: block-building spreads to thousands of clients globally,” said Malik672, emphasizing the significance of decentralization in Ethereum’s ethos.

Explore how *Malik672’s* proposed changes could reshape Ethereum’s block production, reducing centralization and protecting user transactions from profit-driven tactics.

Proposed Decentralized Random Block Proposal to Enhance Ethereum

The current landscape of Ethereum’s block production has raised concerns over *centralization* and *Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)*. The proposal from researcher *Malik672* contends that a Decentralized Random Block Proposal could fundamentally change the way blocks are constructed on the Ethereum network. Utilizing a Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) mechanism, the initiative aims not only to democratize block production but also to mitigate potential issues associated with centralized builders.

Current Centralization Trends in Ethereum Block Production

As highlighted by *Toni Wahrstätter*, an Ethereum Foundation researcher, the level of centralization among block builders has been significant—two builders alone accounted for 88.7% of blocks produced in a recent span. Although this number has decreased slightly to around 80%, it still represents a concentration of power that the Ethereum community finds concerning. The challenge lies in the *Proposer-Builder Separation* (PBS) model, which has altered the dynamics of MEV but created new forms of centralization, indicating a need for *decentralized solutions*.

Mechanics of the Decentralized Random Block Proposal

Under *Malik672’s* framework, block production would involve a cryptographically random selection of clients rather than a few chosen builders. This shift is pivotal in curbing the prevalent manipulation strategies inherent in transaction reordering and censorship, primarily driven by profit motivations. Moreover, Malik672 underscores that this system aligns more closely with Ethereum’s intended *trustless* principles while allowing adaptability to projected scaling solutions like *Danksharding*.

Implications for Ethereum’s Transaction Propagation and Slot Times

Potential benefits of Malik672’s proposal extend beyond decentralization. The implementation of this model may enhance transaction propagation efficiency, with reports suggesting slot times could decrease significantly from 12 seconds to between 6 to 8 seconds. Such a shift would not only improve user experiences but also align Ethereum’s technical advancements with its end-users’ needs.

Conclusion

*Malik672’s* proposed model represents a promising avenue for Ethereum to tackle pressing issues related to centralization and MEV. By re-envisioning how blocks are proposed and constructed, Ethereum could further its commitment to decentralization while improving transaction throughput. The outcome of these proposed changes stands to firmly solidify Ethereum’s landscape in addressing user needs without succumbing to profit-driven pressures.