Meta data center deal: Meta Platforms and Blue Owl Capital reached a roughly $30 billion joint-ownership and financing agreement for the Hyperion data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana — Meta will retain about 20% while financiers arranged approximately $27 billion in loans and $2.5 billion in investments.
-
Deal size and ownership split: ~ $30 billion transaction; Meta keeps ~20% stake.
-
Financing structure: Morgan Stanley arranged roughly $27B in loans plus ~$2.5B in investments via a special purpose vehicle.
-
Broader context: Tech bond issuance rose to approximately $157B by late September, a 70% year-over-year increase.
Meta data center deal: Meta and Blue Owl finalize a $30B Hyperion financing; Meta keeps 20% stake. Read COINOTAG’s concise analysis and timeline.
What is the Meta data center deal?
Meta data center deal refers to a joint-ownership and financing agreement in which Meta Platforms Inc. and Blue Owl Capital Inc. will share ownership of the Hyperion data center in Richland Parish, Louisiana. Under the arrangement, Meta retains roughly 20% of the asset while external financiers provide most of the capital.
How is the Hyperion financing structured?
The financing is structured through a mix of debt and investment facilitated by Morgan Stanley, which arranged about $27 billion in loans and roughly $2.5 billion in equity-style investments via a special purpose vehicle. Meta will act as developer, operator and tenant, but will not carry the debt directly. Projected completion is scheduled for 2029, and participants include institutional investors such as Pacific Investment Management Co. and Blue Owl, according to people familiar with the matter. This model lets Meta limit balance-sheet leverage while giving investors exposure to a large physical asset.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much of Hyperion will Meta own after the deal?
Meta will retain approximately 20% ownership of the Hyperion data center. The remainder will be owned by Blue Owl Capital and other institutional investors who participated through the financing vehicle arranged by Morgan Stanley.
Why did Meta choose to structure financing this way?
Meta pursued an off-balance-sheet financing model so it can develop and operate Hyperion without taking on the construction debt directly. This approach preserves Meta’s corporate credit profile while allowing asset managers to invest in a tangible infrastructure asset.
Report details and supporting data
Sources cited in reporting include statements from people familiar with the transaction and public data on corporate bond markets. Morgan Stanley served as the arranging bank, bringing together asset managers and infrastructure lenders. Pacific Investment Management Co. (Pimco) and Blue Owl emerged as major participants in the financing syndicate. Market-level context: U.S. technology-sector issuers had raised roughly $157 billion in bond markets by late September, an increase of about 70% year-over-year.
Related industry development: xAI fundraising
Parallel to the Hyperion deal, xAI — Elon Musk’s AI company — completed a structured financing round valued at about $20 billion. That package combined roughly $7.5 billion in equity and around $12.5 billion in debt, using a special purpose vehicle to buy and lease Nvidia GPUs to xAI for a multi-year term. The bonds in that deal were reported to mature in 2049 and were expected to price at roughly 225 basis points over Treasuries, with Morgan Stanley acting as sole bookrunner and Pimco participating as a major lender, according to people familiar with the transaction.
Key Takeaways
- Transaction scale: The Hyperion arrangement is one of the largest private-capital infrastructure deals, valued near $30 billion.
- Financing mechanics: The structure relies on a special purpose vehicle with approximately $27B in loans and $2.5B in investments arranged by Morgan Stanley.
- Strategic outcome: Meta limits direct debt exposure while remaining the developer, operator and tenant; institutional investors gain exposure to a sizable physical asset.
Conclusion
The Meta data center deal represents a major example of how technology companies and financial institutions are jointly funding large-scale AI and data infrastructure. By retaining a minority stake and offloading most construction debt, Meta preserves its balance sheet while enabling significant institutional investment in Hyperion. For further updates and timeline tracking, follow COINOTAG’s coverage. Published: October 17, 2025. Updated: October 17, 2025. Author/Organization: COINOTAG.
Sources (plain text): Morgan Stanley; Blue Owl Capital Inc.; Pacific Investment Management Co. (Pimco); people familiar with the matter; corporate bond market data through late September (public market reports).
