• Minnesota AG urges all crypto ATM users to participate in the quick survey.

• Survey targets habits like machine types, frequent providers, and scam incidents.

• FBI reports $246.7 million lost to crypto ATM fraud in 2024, highlighting national risks.

Minnesota crypto ATM survey by AG Keith Ellison seeks user experiences to fight scams. Complete it in one minute, share habits and losses to protect residents from fraud. Act now for safer transactions.

What is the Minnesota crypto ATM survey?

The Minnesota crypto ATM survey is an initiative by Attorney General Keith Ellison to collect data on residents’ interactions with cryptocurrency automated teller machines across the state. Launched to address escalating fraud, it gathers insights on user preferences, referral sources, frequent providers, and instances of financial loss. Ellison emphasizes its brevity, requiring only a minute, and its role in equipping authorities to counter scammers effectively.

Why has Minnesota launched this crypto ATM survey?

Scammers continually innovate tactics to defraud Minnesotans, making tools like crypto ATMs prime targets due to transaction irreversibility and traceability challenges. Ellison stated in a release that staying ahead of criminals demands real user data, as fraud rates climb. The survey directly follows a December 19 scam alert warning of evolving techniques with rising success. This fits into the Consumer Protection Division’s ongoing probe into crypto ATMs, enabling targeted protections. According to FBI data, nationwide losses hit $246.7 million in 2024 from such fraud, underscoring urgency. Ellison advises safer crypto purchase methods over ATMs to minimize risks. Participation helps map scam patterns, informing regulations and enforcement. Washington, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb echoed concerns, suing Athena Bitcoin for allegedly facilitating over 93% scam deposits via undisclosed fees and weak safeguards. Athena Bitcoin defends its multi-layered verifications, limits, and warnings, vowing court defense. These developments signal growing regulatory scrutiny on operators nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

What questions does the Minnesota crypto ATM survey include?

The survey asks about preferred crypto ATM types, most-used company machines, who introduced users to them, and any funds lost from transactions. Emailed to known users of major providers, it focuses on habits revealing scam vulnerabilities without requiring personal financial details beyond loss reports.

Are crypto ATM scams targeting Minnesota residents more frequently?

Yes, Minnesota officials report heightened targeting, prompting AG Ellison’s survey and prior scam alerts. Criminals favor these machines for untraceable transfers, aligning with FBI’s $246.7 million 2024 loss figure. Completing the survey helps authorities respond swiftly to protect locals from these evolving threats.

Key Takeaways

• Survey Urgency: AG Ellison calls on all Minnesota crypto ATM users to spend one minute sharing experiences for scam-fighting insights.
• Fraud Scale: FBI tallies $246.7 million in 2024 crypto ATM losses; 93% of Athena Bitcoin deposits allegedly scam-related per D.C. lawsuit.
• Protect Yourself: Opt for regulated exchanges over ATMs; heed warnings on fees, limits, and verifications to avoid irreversible scams.

Conclusion

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison’s crypto ATM survey represents a proactive step against surging fraud, collecting vital user data on machines and losses to safeguard residents. Echoing national trends like FBI statistics and D.C.’s Athena Bitcoin case, it bolsters the Consumer Protection Division’s investigation. By participating, Minnesotans contribute to stronger defenses, while exploring verified alternatives ensures secure crypto engagement amid regulatory evolution.

Minnesota’s push highlights broader U.S. concerns over crypto ATMs as scam conduits. Transactions here bypass traditional banking oversight, allowing rapid, anonymous conversions to cryptocurrencies that scammers demand in schemes like tech support fraud or romance cons. Victims often discover excessive fees—sometimes 20-30% undisclosed—only post-transaction, when funds vanish irreversibly.

Ellison’s December 19 alert detailed criminals’ adaptations, such as impersonating officials to coerce ATM use. Success rates rise because blockchain anonymity shields perpetrators. The survey targets this by identifying hotspots, popular kiosks, and victim pathways, potentially leading to operator mandates for geofencing or enhanced IDs.

Nationally, enforcement intensifies. The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center attributes much of crypto investment fraud to ATMs, with 2024 marking record losses. State AGs coordinate, as Schwalb’s suit alleges Athena ignored red flags like repeat small deposits from single phones. Athena counters with its five verification screens, daily caps at $1,000, and on-screen alerts about scam risks.

For Minnesotans, safer paths include licensed exchanges like Coinbase or Gemini, offering recourse and transparency. Always verify send addresses, avoid unsolicited investment tips, and report suspicions to the AG’s office. This survey not only informs policy but empowers users through awareness.

Operators face pressure to evolve. Beyond Athena, firms like Bitcoin Depot install AI-driven fraud detection, partnering with chains for placement. Yet, proliferation—over 37,000 U.S. ATMs per Coin ATM Radar—outpaces oversight. Ellison’s effort sets a model, potentially inspiring peer states.

Expert voices reinforce: Federal Trade Commission notes crypto scams topped $3 billion in complaints last year, ATMs a fraction but potent. Blockchain analysts stress on-ramps like ATMs enable fiat-to-crypto speed, ideal for urgency ploys. Participating in the Minnesota crypto ATM survey positions residents as allies in curbing this, fostering a more secure digital asset landscape.