Notcoin (NTC) Scandal? $6.8 Million Donation to Telegram’s CEO Sparks Controversy

TON

TON/USDT

$1.417
+1.87%
24h Volume

$69,821,485.26

24h H/L

$1.434 / $1.384

Change: $0.0500 (3.61%)

Funding Rate

+0.0024%

Longs pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
TON
TON
Daily

$1.412

-0.84%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$1.6602
Resistance 2$1.537
Resistance 1$1.4584
Price$1.412
Support 1$1.3881
Support 2$1.2651
Support 3$1.124
Pivot (PP):$1.4107
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):43.2
(11:02 AM UTC)
2 min read

Contents

764 views
0 comments
  • The burgeoning world of cryptocurrency continues to grapple with issues of transparency, with a recent donation raising eyebrows across the digital currency landscape.
  • Notcoin, a brand new play-to-earn game built on the Telegram messaging platform, sent a hefty $6.8 million worth of its own tokens (NOT) to Telegram founder Pavel Durov.
  • “Thanks for everything you guys built.” – Notcoin’s public message to Telegram and Pavel Durov.

This article explores the controversial $6.8 million token donation by Notcoin to Telegram’s Pavel Durov, raising questions about transparency and potential insider trading within the crypto community.

Lack Of Transparency Breeds Insider Trading Fears

The core of the controversy lies in Notcoin’s lack of clear communication. When the donation was announced, the project’s team failed to disclose a crucial detail: donors who participated in the “thank you” campaign would receive double the amount of NOT tokens they contributed. This bombshell revelation has left many users feeling duped.

Speculations of Insider Benefits

Critics point out that this lack of transparency opens the door for potential insider trading. Team members privy to this information could have strategically positioned themselves to benefit from the doubled rewards. Essentially, they could have inflated their NOT holdings with zero risk, leaving regular participants at a disadvantage.

Crypto Community Demands Clarity

The Notcoin fiasco serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency in the crypto world. The industry has a well-documented history of operating in the shadows, and this incident highlights the need for clearer communication and well-defined protocols, especially when it comes to significant financial transactions.

Notcoin: Is It Legit?

The community is demanding answers. Many are questioning the legitimacy of NOT’s play-to-earn model, which involves users “mining” NOT tokens through repetitive clicking. Skeptics point out the similarities to memecoins, a category notorious for its high volatility and frequent crashes. Notcoin’s own value has indeed dropped significantly since its launch, mirroring the recent decline of Bitcoin.

Conclusion

While the donation may have garnered Notcoin some fleeting attention, the project’s long-term prospects remain uncertain. The controversy surrounding the Durov donation casts a long shadow, and the success of a game built on repetitive clicking remains to be seen. Only time will tell if Notcoin is a genuine innovation or simply a glittering gimmick designed to lure unsuspecting investors into murky waters.

DK

David Kim

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/7/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

2/6/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

2/5/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

2/4/2026