- The U.S. Department of Justice is pushing for the arrest of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF).
- The Department accuses SBF of attempting to influence witnesses.
- The defense team responds strongly, denying the allegations.
|Before you reading,
Don't miss coins like PEPE again! Click here to find new PEPEs!
The U.S. Department of Justice is advocating for the arrest of Sam Bankman-Fried, alleging that he has been trying to influence witnesses. The defense team has countered these allegations, maintaining that they are unfounded.
U.S. Department of Justice’s Response to SBF’s Defense
The U.S. Department of Justice has responded to the defense team of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), accusing him of painting himself in a negative light. The Department pointed out that SBF did not deny giving the diary of former Alameda Research CEO, Caroline Ellison, to the New York Times. They argue that due to this, he should remain in custody until the trial. The Department believes that SBF has gone far beyond fair commentary by sharing personal data.
|Did you missed the PEPE? No worries, click here to 100x potential memes!
In their initial application last week, the Department drew attention to SBF’s alleged attempts to negatively influence witnesses. Examples cited included SBF’s use of a VPN, reaching out to FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller, and sharing Ellison’s diary.
SBF’s Defense Team’s Response
In response to the Department of Justice, SBF’s lawyers argued on Tuesday that the actions were mischaracterized and painted SBF in a bad light. They stated that the former exchange CEO was merely trying to defend his reputation against the press and initially did not reach out to Miller. The Department of Justice, however, countered that the defense team had mischaracterized the actions. They reiterated that SBF’s actions have painted him in a negative light.
Department of Justice’s Allegations
|You are looking to New 1000x Potential Gems: We recommended to Click Here to Buy Safely!
The Department of Justice has claimed that SBF has repeatedly tried to influence witness statements, arguing that the bail conditions are insufficient to protect the public. They have suggested that SBF should be sent to prison before his hearing in October.
The U.S. Department of Justice and Sam Bankman-Fried’s defense team are locked in a battle over allegations of witness tampering. As the case unfolds, the crypto community will be watching closely to see how these accusations impact SBF and the broader cryptocurrency landscape.