News

Report Warns CAR’s Sango Coin Push May Prioritize Foreign Investors Over Local Benefits

Loading market data...
Bitcoin
Bitcoin

-

-

Volume (24h): -

(03:43 PM UTC)
4 min read

Contents

590 views
0 comments

  • Poorly designed projects: Initiatives like Sango Coin failed to attract significant investment and lacked transparency in fund usage.

  • High risks of manipulation: The CAR meme coin saw extreme price volatility, with 80% of supply controlled by developers, enabling potential scams.

  • Limited economic impact: Despite promises of growth, sales from tokenization efforts raised only $38,000 by late 2025, with unclear benefits to the state.

Explore the risks and failures of Central African Republic cryptocurrency ventures in this detailed report analysis. Discover why these initiatives may undermine economic sovereignty. Read now for expert insights.

What is the Central African Republic’s Approach to Cryptocurrency?

Central African Republic cryptocurrency strategy began in 2022 with the adoption of Bitcoin as legal tender, followed by launches like Sango Coin and the CAR meme coin under President Faustin-Archange Touadéra. These efforts aimed to drive economic growth and modernization in one of the world’s poorest nations but have faced significant backlash for opacity and ineffectiveness. A recent report from the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime highlights how these projects prioritize foreign speculators over domestic needs, raising concerns about governance and sovereignty.

How Have CAR’s Crypto Projects Performed Financially?

The Sango Coin, introduced as a Bitcoin-backed token to fund infrastructure, struggled from the outset. Marketed to international investors with promises of citizenship and land access—later invalidated by the Constitutional Court—only 10% of its 210 million tokens sold, generating under €2 million. No public records detail fund allocation, and ambitious plans for a crypto city in Bangui remain unrealized. Regional regulators, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank expressed opposition due to regulatory gaps. Similarly, the 2023 law on natural resource tokenization lacks anti-money laundering protections, exposing the country to exploitation. On-chain data reveals vulnerabilities, such as in the CAR meme coin launch in February 2025, where a single wallet held 80% of tokens, leading to a brief $900 million market cap surge followed by a crash. Tokenized land sales yielded just $38,000 by late 2025, with proceeds not transparently reported as state revenue. Digital certificates promoted by the president appeared AI-generated, eroding trust. These outcomes underscore a pattern of hype without substance, benefiting a narrow elite while the population sees minimal gains. Expert analysis from the Global Initiative points to insufficient legal frameworks, stating that current enforcement cannot prevent corruption or illicit finance. Nathalia Dukhan, director of the Central Africa Observatory at the organization, emphasized the lack of political will to address financial crimes, noting that opacity attracts illicit actors. This aligns with broader concerns in the Central African Republic, where reliance on external entities like Russia’s Wagner Group for security has traded resource access for influence, mirroring crypto’s outsourcing of authority.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Main Risks of Central African Republic Cryptocurrency Initiatives?

The primary risks include vulnerability to money laundering, terrorism financing, and market manipulation due to opaque governance and concentrated token control. The report from the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime details how projects like Sango Coin and the CAR meme coin lack safeguards, potentially eroding national sovereignty and benefiting foreign criminals over local development.

Why Did Sango Coin Fail in the Central African Republic?

Sango Coin failed due to low investor uptake, regulatory hurdles from the IMF and World Bank, and legal challenges that revoked incentives like citizenship offers. Launched in 2022 to modernize finance, it raised only €2 million from 10% of tokens sold, with no transparency on fund use, leading to stalled projects like the proposed crypto city.

Key Takeaways

  • Opacity breeds risks: CAR’s crypto ventures, from Sango Coin to meme tokens, suffer from poor transparency, enabling manipulation and illicit activities without benefiting citizens.
  • Foreign focus over local needs: Initiatives cater to international speculators, as seen in tokenized land sales yielding minimal revenue, while domestic economic growth remains elusive.
  • Need for stronger regulations: Implementing robust anti-money laundering measures and clear governance could mitigate abuses, urging policymakers to prioritize sovereignty and inclusive development.

Conclusion

The Central African Republic’s cryptocurrency experiments, including Bitcoin adoption and tokens like Sango Coin, highlight critical flaws in design and execution, as outlined in the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime’s report. While intended to spur investment and modernization, these Central African Republic cryptocurrency efforts have instead amplified risks of abuse and economic dependency on foreign actors. Moving forward, bolstering regulatory frameworks and ensuring transparency will be essential to harnessing digital assets for genuine national benefit—policymakers should act decisively to protect sovereignty and foster equitable growth.

Marisol Navaro

Marisol Navaro

Marisol Navaro is a young 21-year-old writer who is passionate about following in Satoshi's footsteps in the cryptocurrency industry. With a drive to learn and understand the latest trends and developments, Marisol provides fresh insights and perspectives on the world of cryptocurrency.
View all posts

Comments

Yorumlar

HomeFlashMarketProfile
    Report Warns CAR’s Sango Coin Push May Prioritize Foreign Investors Over Local Benefits - COINOTAG