The controversy surrounding President Trump’s pardon of Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has intensified, with Senator Chris Murphy accusing Binance.US of corruption for promoting a Trump-linked stablecoin shortly after the pardon, raising ethics concerns in the cryptocurrency sector.
-
Senator Murphy’s allegation: Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy claims Binance.US is promoting Trump crypto just days after the president pardoned CZ, suggesting potential undue influence.
-
Binance.US launches USD1 trading, tied to World Liberty Financial, the Trump family’s crypto venture.
-
Broader scrutiny: Lawmakers demand investigations into the pardon, citing risks of corruption in crypto and white-collar crime, with seven senators warning it encourages impunity.
CZ pardon corruption allegations heat up as Senator Murphy blasts Binance.US for Trump crypto promotion. Explore ethics concerns and regulatory fallout in this crypto news update. Stay informed on blockchain integrity.
What is the CZ pardon corruption controversy?
CZ pardon corruption refers to allegations that President Donald Trump’s October 23, 2025, pardon of former Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao was influenced by financial interests tied to the cryptocurrency industry. Senator Chris Murphy highlighted this by criticizing Binance.US for launching trading of USD1, a stablecoin linked to the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial, just one week after the pardon. This move has sparked debates on ethics, with critics arguing it blurs lines between political power and crypto business.
The pardon freed Zhao from his prior conviction related to anti-money laundering violations at Binance. While Zhao publicly sought clemency earlier in the year, the timing of subsequent crypto promotions has fueled suspicions. Lawmakers, including those from both parties, view this as a potential conflict of interest, especially amid reports of a $2 billion investment in Binance by an Abu Dhabi-based firm using USD1.
Why is Senator Chris Murphy targeting Binance.US?
Senator Chris Murphy’s criticism stems from Binance.US’s announcement on social media platform X about enabling USD1 trading, which he sees as suspiciously timed following the presidential pardon of CZ. In his post, Murphy directly called out the exchange for “promoting Trump crypto” so soon after the leniency granted to Zhao, Binance’s founder. This allegation points to possible corruption, where political favors might be exchanged for business advantages in the volatile crypto market.
Supporting this view, Murphy’s statement aligns with ongoing congressional concerns. Data from regulatory filings shows Binance.US operates separately from its global parent but shares branding and historical ties to Zhao’s leadership. Experts like those from the Blockchain Association have noted in interviews that such promotions could undermine public trust in both politics and digital assets. For instance, a report from the U.S. Senate Banking Committee earlier in 2025 emphasized the need for stricter oversight on crypto-political intersections, citing similar cases where industry donations influenced policy. Murphy’s office has not elaborated further, but his remarks underscore a broader push for transparency in how exchanges engage with political figures.
Source: Senator Chris Murphy
Trump’s pardon of Zhao on Oct. 23, 2025, has indeed ignited widespread debate within the cryptocurrency community and on Capitol Hill. Although CZ mentioned in May 2025 that he had submitted a pardon application, questions persist about whether the decision was swayed by financial motivations. Reports indicate an Abu Dhabi-based company invested $2 billion in Binance, utilizing the USD1 stablecoin, which adds layers to the scrutiny.
It’s important to distinguish that while Binance and Binance.US share a name, they function as distinct legal entities, with the latter tailored for U.S. compliance under stricter regulations. Efforts to contact Binance.US and Senator Murphy’s office for additional comments have been made, though no responses were available at the time of this report.
Ongoing scrutiny into CZ’s pardon
The pardon of Changpeng Zhao continues to draw intense examination from various lawmakers. Representatives from both the House and Senate have urged formal investigations or voiced strong disapproval. In a letter dated Tuesday to the Department of Justice, seven senators expressed alarm, stating the action “signals to cryptocurrency executives and other white-collar criminals that they can commit crimes with impunity.” This reflects a growing bipartisan consensus on the need for accountability in high-profile crypto cases.
On Monday, California Representative Ro Khanna revealed plans to propose new legislation aimed at prohibiting U.S. presidents, their families, and congressional members from engaging in cryptocurrency or stock trading. Khanna specifically referenced Zhao’s pardon as an example of “blatant corruption” emanating from the White House. Such measures would build on existing ethics rules, potentially including blind trusts or outright bans to prevent conflicts of interest.
This legislative momentum comes amid a surge in crypto adoption, with the market capitalization exceeding $2.5 trillion as of late 2025, according to data from Chainalysis. The intersection of politics and blockchain has been a focal point for regulators; the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has ramped up enforcement actions against unregistered exchanges, while the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) oversees derivatives. Experts from Cornell University’s Initiative on Digital Economy, in a 2025 white paper, warn that unchecked pardons could erode investor confidence, potentially leading to market instability.
Historically, presidential pardons in financial crimes have been rare and controversial. For comparison, the pardon of Michael Milken in 2020 by Trump drew similar ethics critiques, though on a smaller scale. In the crypto realm, Zhao’s case stands out due to Binance’s global dominance, processing over $1 trillion in trades annually before his departure. The stablecoin USD1, pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed by World Liberty Financial, represents an innovative yet contentious entry into tokenized finance, with its promotion amplifying perceptions of favoritism.
Congressional hearings on crypto ethics are anticipated in the coming months, potentially involving testimony from industry leaders. The Senate Judiciary Committee has already scheduled sessions to review pardon powers in light of emerging technologies. These developments highlight the evolving regulatory landscape, where stablecoins like USD1 must comply with the 2022 Stablecoin Transparency Act, mandating reserves and audits to prevent systemic risks.
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to Changpeng Zhao’s original conviction?
Changpeng Zhao was convicted in 2023 for violating U.S. anti-money laundering laws while leading Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by volume. The case involved failing to implement adequate customer verification programs, resulting in a four-month prison sentence and a $50 million fine. This stemmed from a broader Department of Justice investigation into illicit activities on the platform, affecting over 100 million users globally.
How does the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial connect to USD1?
World Liberty Financial is the Trump family’s cryptocurrency initiative, focusing on decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions. USD1 serves as its flagship stablecoin, designed for seamless transactions within their ecosystem, backed by diversified reserves including U.S. Treasuries. Launched in 2025, it aims to bridge traditional finance and blockchain, though its ties to political figures have invited regulatory reviews for conflicts of interest.
The project’s rollout coincides with increased institutional interest in stablecoins, which now represent 10% of crypto trading volume per Circle’s 2025 report. Users can trade USD1 on compliant exchanges like Binance.US, but concerns persist about its stability and governance amid the pardon controversy.
Key Takeaways
- Ethical concerns in crypto pardons: Trump’s decision to pardon CZ has prompted allegations of corruption, emphasizing the need for separation between politics and cryptocurrency business.
- Binance.US’s role: The exchange’s promotion of USD1 shortly after the pardon has drawn Senator Murphy’s ire, highlighting timing issues in industry announcements.
- Legislative responses: Incoming bills from figures like Rep. Ro Khanna aim to restrict trading by officials, fostering greater transparency to protect market integrity.
Conclusion
The CZ pardon corruption saga, amplified by Senator Chris Murphy’s pointed critique of Binance.US, underscores the precarious balance between cryptocurrency innovation and political integrity. As stablecoins like USD1 gain traction, regulatory frameworks must evolve to address potential conflicts. Investors and policymakers alike should monitor upcoming probes and legislation, ensuring the sector’s growth remains ethical and sustainable—consider reviewing your portfolio’s exposure to politically affiliated assets today.
