The Solana Policy Institute donated $500,000 to fund the legal appeals of Tornado Cash developers Roman Storm and Alexey Pertsev, supporting their defenses against U.S. and Dutch convictions and aiming to challenge criminal liability for creators of neutral, decentralized software.
-
$500,000 donation to fund appeals for Tornado Cash developers
-
Donation supports legal challenges to convictions in the U.S. (Storm) and the Netherlands (Pertsev).
-
Advocates warn convictions set a precedent affecting software developers and decentralized software.
Meta description: Solana Policy Institute donation of $500,000 backs Tornado Cash developers’ appeals—supporting legal defense for decentralized software creators. Learn key details.
What is the Solana Policy Institute donation for?
The Solana Policy Institute donation of $500,000 will fund legal appeals and defense costs for Tornado Cash developers Roman Storm and Alexey Pertsev following their convictions in the U.S. and the Netherlands. The donation is intended to challenge legal theories that could criminalize neutral software development.
How will the funds be used to support appeals?
Funds will primarily cover appellate counsel, expert witnesses, and litigation expenses. Appellate briefs in Manhattan and in the Netherlands require technical experts to explain how Tornado Cash operated as neutral, non-custodial software. The stated goal is to prevent a precedent that expands criminal liability for developers.
What are the convictions and potential sentences?
Roman Storm was convicted in Manhattan for operating an illegal money transmitting business and faces up to five years in federal prison. Alexey Pertsev was convicted in the Netherlands and received a sentence exceeding five years for money laundering. Both judgments are now the subject of planned appeals.
Why do advocates say these cases matter for software developers?
Advocates argue that prosecuting creators of neutral tools for illicit use sets a chilling precedent for software development. If upheld, these convictions could create legal risk for engineers building decentralized or open-source systems that do not control user funds.
When might the appeals clarify policy direction?
Appeals will determine whether appellate courts accept the government’s approach to developer liability. A successful appeal could either reinforce the convictions or limit criminal exposure for creators of non-custodial, decentralized software. Timing depends on court schedules and procedural filings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will this donation change DOJ or Dutch prosecution policies?
The donation funds legal challenges; it does not directly change prosecutorial policies. However, appellate rulings can influence future prosecutorial strategies and legislative responses by clarifying legal standards for developer liability.
Who has publicly commented on the donation and its implications?
Solana Policy Institute CEO Miller Whitehouse-Levine stated the prosecutions threaten developers’ work. Industry figures, including Bitcoin advocate Erik Voorhees, publicly discussed whether rival networks’ backers would support Tornado Cash developers. These comments emphasize cross-industry concern.
Key Takeaways
- $500,000 donation: Supports appeals for Roman Storm and Alexey Pertsev to challenge convictions tied to Tornado Cash.
- Precedent risk: Convictions could expand criminal liability for creators of neutral, decentralized software.
- Industry response: The donation adds momentum to broader advocacy seeking legal clarity for developers and open-source projects.
Conclusion
The Solana Policy Institute donation directly backs the legal appeals of Tornado Cash developers and seeks to contest legal theories that could criminalize creators of non-custodial, decentralized software. The outcomes of these appeals will be pivotal for developer risk, industry advocacy, and regulatory clarity. Follow updates from COINOTAG for developments.
