• South Korea enforces no-fault compensation on crypto exchanges post-Upbit hack to ensure user restitution without proving negligence.

• Exchanges face treatment similar to banks, with enhanced compliance and security standards to prevent systemic failures.

• Since 2023, major platforms reported 20 system failures affecting over 900 users and causing 5 billion won in losses, highlighting the need for reform.

South Korea cryptocurrency regulations target exchanges with no-fault liability after Upbit hack. Learn how these bank-like rules boost security and fines up to 3% revenue. Stay informed on crypto protections—read now for key insights.

What Are South Korea’s New Cryptocurrency Regulations for Exchanges?

South Korea’s new cryptocurrency regulations require major exchanges to adopt no-fault compensation rules, treating them like traditional banks to safeguard users from hacks and system breakdowns. The Financial Services Commission (FSC) announced these plans following a significant security incident at Upbit, South Korea’s largest exchange, where hackers siphoned off assets worth approximately $30.1 million. This overhaul aims to close regulatory gaps by imposing stricter liability, IT security mandates, and penalties, fostering a more secure digital asset ecosystem without speculation on future enforcement outcomes.

How Will No-Fault Compensation Impact Crypto Exchanges in South Korea?

Under the proposed framework, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) must reimburse users for losses due to system failures or cyberattacks, irrespective of negligence. This mirrors existing rules for electronic payment firms and banks under electronic financial transaction laws, extending consumer protections to the crypto sector. Data from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) indicates that between 2023 and September 2025, five leading exchanges—Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax—experienced 20 outages, impacting over 900 users with total damages of 5 billion won. Upbit reported six such incidents, affecting more than 600 individuals and resulting in 3 billion won in losses. Experts note this liability shift could raise operational costs but ultimately build trust. FSS Governor Lee Chan-jin emphasized the limitations of current oversight, stating, “The hacking is not something we can overlook. However, regulatory oversight clearly has limits in imposing penalties.” The regulations also demand comprehensive IT security plans and elevated staffing standards to mitigate risks proactively, supported by historical breach analyses showing delayed reporting exacerbates damages.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Triggered South Korea’s Stricter Cryptocurrency Regulations?

The Upbit hack on November 27, where 104 billion Solana-based coins valued at 44.5 billion won were stolen in 54 minutes, exposed vulnerabilities. Regulators, limited by existing laws that cap fines at 5 billion won without mandatory restitution, pushed for reforms to align crypto platforms with banking standards and protect consumers effectively.

How Do These Regulations Affect Users of South Korean Crypto Exchanges?

Users benefit from guaranteed compensation for losses from hacks or failures, regardless of exchange fault, enhancing security confidence. Platforms must improve IT infrastructure and reporting, reducing downtime risks, while fines up to 3% of revenue incentivize compliance, ensuring a safer environment for trading digital assets.

Key Takeaways

• No-Fault Liability: Exchanges must cover user losses from breaches without proving negligence, akin to banking rules, following the Upbit incident’s $30 million theft.
• Systemic Reforms: With 20 failures across major platforms since 2023 causing 5 billion won in damages, new standards mandate robust IT security and staffing to prevent recurrence.
• Enhanced Penalties: Fines could reach 3% of annual revenue, replacing the 5 billion won cap, to enforce accountability and close oversight gaps in the crypto market.

Conclusion

South Korea’s cryptocurrency regulations mark a pivotal shift, imposing bank-like no-fault compensation and heightened security on exchanges amid rising threats like the Upbit hack. By addressing systemic failures and boosting financial accountability, these measures—drawn from FSS data and FSC proposals—promise greater user protection in the evolving digital asset landscape. As enforcement progresses, stakeholders should monitor developments to navigate this more resilient framework effectively.

The new legislation would treat major crypto platforms like traditional banks, enforcing strict compliance, IT security standards, and stronger protection.

Key Highlights

• South Korea would enforce no-fault compensation rules on crypto exchanges after the Upbit hack.
• Exchanges would be treated like banks and may face fines up to 3% of annual revenue.
• The move addresses systemic security failures, including 20 system failures reported across major platforms since 2023.

The South Korean government is preparing rules to make cryptocurrency exchanges more financially liable, following a recent major security breach on Upbit, the country’s largest exchange. On Sunday, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) revealed its plans for a regulatory overhaul to impose bank-level, no-fault compensation rules on Virtual Asset Service Providers.

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) {
div[id^=”wrapper-sevio-e0d3bc50-0aae-47cc-a8d7-f0c9a0cef941″] {
width: 320px;
height: 100px;
}
}
@media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) {
div[id^=”wrapper-sevio-e0d3bc50-0aae-47cc-a8d7-f0c9a0cef941″] {
width: 728px;
height: 90px;
}
}

As per a report by the Korean Times, the proposed law aims to make the same consumer protection requirements for major crypto exchanges as the traditional finance players. The motivation for this regulatory about-face is the need for a stronger legal framework that would better protect consumers and enhance security standards in Korea’s fast-growing digital asset market.

Mandatory no-fault compensation

Under the bill being discussed with the FSC, Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) would be obligated to reimburse users’ losses resulting from system breakdowns or hacking, regardless of whether such breakdowns or hacking are attributed to negligence on the part of the exchange.

No-fault liability already applies to electronic payment companies and financial institutions under the law governing electronic financial transactions, meaning crypto platforms will fall under an updated set of regulatory requirements.

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) {
div[id^=”wrapper-sevio-bf4b3de1-2d49-4069-adb2-b7d50bdcc555″] {
width: 320px;
height: 100px;
}
}
@media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) {
div[id^=”wrapper-sevio-bf4b3de1-2d49-4069-adb2-b7d50bdcc555″] {
width: 728px;
height: 90px;
}
}

The push for this regulatory change was the public security compromise at Upbit on November 27. This included about 104 billion Solana-based coins valued at about 44.5 billion won ($30.1 million) that were transferred to external wallets in 54 minutes.

Despite the size of the breach, regulators are somewhat hamstrung; under current law, they are unable to issue orders compelling the exchange to provide restitution to those affected, meaning penalties against the platform are minimal.

Widespread system failures

The incident shows that the problem lies with the systemic issues in the sector. According to data from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), the five major crypto exchanges, Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax, have reported a total of 20 system failures between 2023 and September 2025, affecting over 900 users and causing total losses amounting to 5 billion won. Upbit alone accounted for six incidents, with over 600 victims suffering combined losses of 3 billion won.

A related concern stemming from the Upbit breach involved scrutiny of internal reporting protocols at the exchange itself. Though reportedly having detected the hack around 5 a.m., Upbit did not notify the FSS until 10:58 a.m.

The timing spurred accusations by some ruling party lawmakers that Upbit tried to keep the information under wraps until after a planned merger between Dunamu, the operator behind Upbit, and Naver Financial wrapped up at 10:50 a.m.

Limits of current oversight

FSS Governor Lee Chan-jin acknowledged the challenges imposed by the current regulatory ceilings, stating, “The hacking is not something we can overlook. However, regulatory oversight clearly has limits in imposing penalties.”

The proposed law is likely to bring about regulatory adjustments for crypto exchanges. In addition to compulsory, no-blame compensation, the draft law is expected to tighten up operational standards, including compelling detailed plans for IT security infrastructure and raising standards for the systems, as well as for personnel staffing at the exchanges.

The law targets increased financial accountability with stronger penalties. For instance, South Korea is considering a revision that allows regulators to fine crypto exchanges up to three percent of their annual revenue in case of hacking incidents. The structure of this penalty is no different from what traditional financial institutions currently face, replacing the current maximum fine cap for crypto exchanges of 5 billion won.

The move will raise the financial risk for exchanges unable to adequately secure their platforms. The immediate response of the government toward greater regulation of Virtual Asset Service Providers shows its efforts to close regulatory gaps exposed by the Upbit incident and similar smaller system failures.

Also Read: Upbit Urges Users to Create New Deposit Wallets in Wake of $37M Hack

Follow The COINOTAG on Google News to Stay Updated!

TAGGED:South Korea