TRON 60% Gas Price Cut Could Lower Fees to $0.59 and Boost Daily Transfers

• TRON cut gas prices 60%, lowering fees to ~$0.59 and making transfers cheaper for users and developers.

• Daily SR revenue dropped from $13.9M to $5.0M, reflecting the immediate income impact.

• Daily TRX transfers rose 54% after prior gas cuts; the new reduction aims to further boost throughput and usability.

TRON gas price reduction cuts fees 60% to $0.59, boosting TRX transfers 54% and lowering costs for users and developers — read the update and implications.

TRON reduces gas fees by 60%, lowering costs and accelerating network activity for users and developers across the blockchain.

• TRON’s 60% gas price reduction dropped transaction fees to $0.59, marking the lowest cost level since April 2024.
• Daily revenue for Super Representatives fell to $5 million, down from $13.9 million, following the network’s gas price adjustment.
• Lower gas prices increased TRON network activity, with daily TRX transfers rising 54%, supporting higher throughput and usability.

TRON has implemented a historic 60% reduction in its transaction gas price, aiming to reduce costs and increase network usage. The adjustment, approved by the Super Representative community, lowers energy unit prices from 210 sun to 100 sun.

Author: COINOTAG • Published: 2025-09-12 • Updated: 2025-09-12

What is TRON’s gas price reduction?

TRON gas price reduction is a protocol-level change cutting the unit gas price from 210 sun to 100 sun, effectively lowering average transaction fees to about $0.59. The reduction aims to make microtransactions and developer tooling more affordable while incentivizing higher on-chain activity.

How did the gas cut affect transaction costs?

Transaction fees fell sharply after the change. Fees moved from $1.55 on August 28 to $0.59 by September 8. This decline reflects the lower unit gas price and directly benefits stablecoin transfers and frequent small-value transactions.

Lower costs reduce friction for payment apps and dApps. Developers face smaller overheads for high-frequency operations. Users conducting daily transfers see immediate savings.

Why did Super Representatives’ revenue decline?

Super Representatives (SRs) collect network fees; a 60% gas cut reduces per-transaction income. Daily SR revenue fell from $13.9 million to $5.0 million on September 7. This represents the lowest daily fee intake in over a year.

Short-term revenue declines are expected after fee reductions. The network is monitoring whether increased volume will offset lower per‑transaction receipts over time.

How has network activity changed after the fee cut?

Lower gas prices historically correlate with increased transfers. When unit gas was 420 sun, the network averaged 2.4 million daily TRX transfers. After a prior cut to 210 sun in September 2024, transfers rose to 3.7 million—a 54% increase.

The new drop to 100 sun is expected to further stimulate activity and throughput. Early indicators show increased user interest and social conversation about improved affordability.

Fee and Activity Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

Will lower gas fees make TRON more attractive for developers?

Yes. Reduced fees lower operational costs for dApps and payment services. Developers can run more frequent on-chain actions with less expense, improving UX for microtransactions and high-throughput use cases.

How long before SR revenue recovers from the fee cut?

Recovery depends on volume growth. If transaction throughput rises enough, total fee income can rebound. Monitoring trends over weeks to months gives a clearer picture of net revenue effects.

Key Takeaways

• Cost reduction: TRON cut unit gas from 210 to 100 sun, dropping fees to ~$0.59.
• Volume impact: Prior gas reductions drove a 54% rise in TRX transfers; further gains are expected.
• Revenue trade-off: SR daily fees fell from $13.9M to $5.0M; sustained volume growth will determine long-term revenue.

Conclusion

The TRON gas price reduction is a strategic move to lower transaction costs and expand network usability. While Super Representatives saw an immediate revenue decline, historical patterns suggest higher throughput may offset lost income over time. Stakeholders should watch weekly transfer and fee data to measure long-term impact.