Trump’s World Liberty Financial Launch Highlights Battle Over Ethereum ETFs and Crypto Regulation

• The launch event for Donald Trump’s World Liberty Financial crypto platform provided a significant highlight in the ongoing debate over U.S. crypto regulations.
• Trump expressed strong opinions about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s regulatory approach under current leadership.
• “If we don’t win the election, those people that were under investigation and that are free as a bird right now, will be living in hell—because it will start the day after the election if they win,” Trump remarked.

Former President Trump states SEC’s crypto regulation may tighten if he is not re-elected, highlighting potential turmoil for crypto builders under investigation by the agency.

Trump Criticizes Aggressive SEC Crypto Regulations Amid Election Campaign

At the event hosted primarily by Rug Radio, aligned with COINOTAG, Trump outlined his concerns about the SEC’s regulatory measures targeting key players in the crypto industry. He openly criticized the agency’s “incredibly hostile” stance, particularly under Chair Gary Gensler’s leadership. Trump noted that exchanges like Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken, among others, have felt the brunt of the regulator’s scrutiny.

SEC’s Surprising Ethereum ETF Approval

Despite the usual hardline stance, there have been unexpected developments. Notably, the SEC’s approval of Ethereum ETFs in July came as a surprise to many. Previously, the approval of Bitcoin ETFs in January was seen as a significant, but isolated, milestone. The sudden shift to greenlight Ethereum ETFs has stirred discussions about the factors influencing this regulatory pivot. Trump suggested that his public endorsement of cryptocurrency may have played a role in easing regulatory pressures, positing, “Maybe they view it as votes.”

Future of Crypto Regulation Under Potential Harris Administration

While recent regulatory moves have sparked various interpretations, Trump’s rival, Kamala Harris, has remained largely silent on her specific strategies for crypto regulation. This leaves a gap in the industry’s understanding of potential future regulatory landscapes. However, influential figures in the crypto sector, such as Mark Cuban, have indicated that Harris’s team is proactively seeking insights from industry experts, suggesting that her administration could have a more informed approach if elected.

Conclusion

The ongoing debate about U.S. cryptocurrency regulation continues to gain momentum, particularly as the election approaches. Trump’s perspectives and promises for a friendlier regulatory environment contrast sharply with the current administration’s actions. As the crypto industry navigates these turbulent times, stakeholders remain keenly attentive to how the forthcoming election results might reshape the landscape of crypto regulation in the United States.