WLFI May See Uptick After Eric Trump-Endorsed Solana Partnership With Bonk.fun and Raydium Introduces USD1 Rewards

• WLFI rose ~3% in 24 hours and gained over 8% for the week after an Eric Trump endorsement.

• The Solana tie-up with Bonk.fun and Raydium introduces multi‑million-dollar USD1 stablecoin incentives for eligible traders.

• WLFI remains 52% below its all‑time high, with approximately $5.90 billion in market value erased since peak levels.

WLFI surge: World Liberty Financial jumps after Eric Trump backs Solana partnership with Bonk.fun and Raydium — learn how to claim USD1 rewards. Read more.

WLFI surged after Eric Trump endorsed its Solana-based collaboration with Bonk.fun and Raydium, driving USD1 stablecoin rewards.

• WLFI gained over 3% in 24 hours, extending weekly growth to 8%, despite Bitcoin and Ethereum posting losses.
• The Solana partnership with Bonk.fun and Raydium introduced multi-million-dollar USD1 promotional rewards for eligible traders.
• WLFI is 52% below its peak, with $5.90 billion in value lost since launch amid volatility and investor disputes.

World Liberty Financial’s governance token WLFI climbed sharply Monday after Eric Trump acknowledged a new Solana-based partnership. The move coincided with promotional USD1 stablecoin incentives announced for traders on Bonk.fun and Raydium, which appear to have driven renewed buying interest.

WLFI rose more than 3% over 24 hours and recorded over an 8% weekly gain, outpacing major cryptocurrencies that were in the red. Traders cited the promotional structure and the high-profile acknowledgement by Eric Trump as immediate catalysts for the price move.

What caused WLFI to surge after the endorsement?

WLFI surged because Eric Trump’s endorsement highlighted a Solana-based collaboration offering multi-million-dollar USD1 stablecoin rewards, prompting short-term demand for the governance token. The endorsement amplified market attention and trading volume despite broader market weakness in Bitcoin and Ethereum.

How does the Solana partnership with Bonk.fun and Raydium work?

The collaboration uses Bonk.fun’s bonding curve mechanics and Raydium’s liquidity infrastructure to allocate USD1 stablecoin incentives to eligible traders. Participants trade USD1 pairs on Bonk.fun’s bonding curve to qualify for rewards structured as promotional payouts over a defined period.

Why does WLFI’s market history matter now?

WLFI remains materially below prior highs, trading roughly 52% under its peak and reflecting about $5.90 billion in lost market value since that high. That historical volatility and earlier governance disputes continue to influence investor risk assessments today.

What earlier setbacks affected WLFI’s debut?

During WLFI’s first week, the platform blacklisted a major investor’s wallet, drawing public criticism and legal claims of unreasonable freezing. The dispute intensified volatility, but the project has sought to regain momentum through strategic partnerships on Solana.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the WLFI rally sustainable?

Short-term rallies around endorsements are common, but sustainability depends on sustained trading demand, liquidity on Solana protocols, and resolution of past governance disputes. Monitoring on-chain volume and official campaign terms is recommended.

Key Takeaways

• Price impact: WLFI jumped ~3% in 24 hours and more than 8% for the week following Eric Trump’s endorsement.
• Partnership mechanics: The Bonk.fun bonding curve and Raydium liquidity pools underpin the USD1 promotional rewards program.
• Investor context: WLFI is still substantially below its peak (‑52%), having lost about $5.90 billion in market value since launch; traders should weigh volatility and prior investor disputes.

Conclusion

The WLFI surge after Eric Trump’s endorsement underscores how high‑profile acknowledgements and targeted incentives on Solana can move governance token prices. Traders should review the promotional terms for USD1 rewards, monitor on‑chain activity on Bonk.fun and Raydium, and consider WLFI’s steep drawdown and past governance issues before reallocating capital.