Technical Analysis

ATOM Technical Analysis February 18, 2026: Market Structure

ATOM

ATOM/USDT

$2.296
+1.86%
24h Volume

$52,884,345.90

24h H/L

$2.338 / $2.212

Change: $0.1260 (5.70%)

Long/Short
62.8%
Long: 62.8%Short: 37.2%
Funding Rate

+0.0047%

Longs pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
ATOM
ATOM
Daily

$2.296

2.45%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$2.8346
Resistance 2$2.5065
Resistance 1$2.335
Price$2.296
Support 1$2.2256
Support 2$2.0633
Support 3$1.8252
Pivot (PP):$2.282
Trend:Sideways
RSI (14):59.0
SC
Sarah Chen
(03:37 PM UTC)
5 min read
525 views
0 comments

[ATOM is trapped in a sideways market structure but gaining bullish momentum with a short-term higher low (HL) formation. If the upper $2.7390 BOS level breaks, trend continuation; if the lower $2.2254 breaks, CHoCH risk increases.]

Market Structure Overview

ATOM's current market structure is generally showing sideways (horizontal) consolidation, moving within a narrow range of $2.21 - $2.43. The current price is at $2.42 and exhibiting a bullish short-term structure above EMA20 ($2.14) with a 7.36% rise in the last 24 hours. However, Supertrend is giving a bearish signal and the $2.77 resistance forms a strong barrier. In multi-timeframe (MTF) analysis, a total of 12 strong levels were identified across 1D, 3D, and 1W timeframes: 2 supports/2 resistances on 1D, 3S/2R on 3D, 3S/2R on 1W. These levels stand out as critical points preserving structural integrity. Market structure analysis examines higher highs/higher lows (HH/HL) or lower highs/lower lows (LH/LL) patterns to determine trend direction. There is no clear HH/HL uptrend at the moment, but the HL formation at the last swing low (holding above the previous $2.2254) is creating a short-term bullish bias. RSI at 63.81 is neutral-bullish, and MACD supports momentum with a positive histogram. The structure is sideways within the range but carries bullish breakout potential.

Trend Analysis: Uptrend or Downtrend?

Uptrend Signals

Higher highs (HH) and higher lows (HL) structure is the cornerstone of an uptrend. In ATOM, an HL formation was observed by holding above the $2.2254 swing low in the recent period – this means a higher bottom than previous lows and signals short-term bullish continuation. The price crossing above EMA20 and the 7% daily rise could push momentum toward HH. MACD's bullish crossover and RSI at 63 levels indicate buyer dominance. If the price breaks the $2.5065 swing high, the uptrend is confirmed with a new HH formation. In this scenario, it could pave the way to $4.0842 according to structural targets (score:4, low probability but structural target).

Downtrend Risk

Lower highs (LH) and lower lows (LL) define a bearish trend. In the sideways structure, there is LH risk: LH can form when $2.7390 and $2.5065 resistances are tested and rejected. Supertrend is bearish and LL risk increases with BTC downtrend influence. If $2.2254 support breaks (score:76/100, strong), CHoCH (change of character) is triggered and the descent to $1.2455 bearish target (score:22) begins. If RSI approaches 70, overbought divergence should be monitored, strengthening LH/LL structure.

Structure Break (BOS) Levels

BOS (break of structure) refers to breakouts that invalidate the current trend. For bullish BOS, a close above $2.7390 (main resistance, score:70/100) or primarily $2.5065 (score:62/100) is required – this breaks the upper band of the sideways range and confirms HH/HL uptrend. Bearish BOS: close below $2.2254 breaks the HL structure and signals transition to LH/LL downtrend. In MTF, 1W supports (around $2.21) are also critical; 3D resistances align with $2.77. If these levels are not surpassed, sideways continues. BOS confirmation is strengthened by volume increase and clean wicks – for example, a wick-free candle above $2.5065 confirms bullish BOS.

Swing Points and Their Importance

Recent Swing Highs

Recent swing highs: $2.7390 (score:70/100, main resistance, previous HH level) and $2.5065 (score:62/100, short-term test point). These levels are where sellers enter; rejection increases LH risk. In a breakout, the new HH target extends to $2.77 Supertrend resistance. Swing highs overlap with fib retracements to create confluence (e.g., 0.618 fib around $2.73).

Recent Swing Lows

Recent swing lows: $2.2254 (score:76/100, strong support, HL formation point) and $2.4050? No, $2.4050 is likely an intermediate low (score:73/100). These lows are bases defended by buyers; holding $2.2254 preserves HL. In a breakdown, descent to 1D/3D supports is rapid. Swing lows should be elevated to competing HHs for trend continuation.

Bitcoin Correlation

ATOM is a highly correlated altcoin with BTC; BTC at $67,387 in downtrend (24h +0.92% but overall LH/LL structure). BTC key supports: $66,555, $62,910, $60,000 – if these break, ATOM's $2.2254 support will be tested with cascade effect. BTC resistances: $68,062, $71,206 – BTC Supertrend bearish, rising dominance crushes alts. ATOM's short-term pump despite BTC, but if BTC goes below $66,555, ATOM's sideways bullish structure breaks. Watch: BTC recovery above $68k triggers ATOM BOS. Details for ATOM Spot Analysis and ATOM Futures Analysis.

Structural Outlook and Expectations

Overall structural outlook: Short-term HL bullish bias within sideways consolidation, but cautious due to BTC downtrend and bearish Supertrend. $2.5065+ BOS required for HH/HL uptrend; otherwise LH/LL risk. MTF strong levels (12 total) balance the structure, continuation more likely than reversal. Educational note: Market structure is dynamic – monitor BOS/CHoCH, absence of news keeps structure in focus. Expectation: $2.2254-$2.7390 range, extension in breakout direction. Risk management: Stop-loss below swing low, targets at fib extensions.

This analysis uses the market views and methodology of Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal.

Market Analyst: Sarah Chen

Technical analysis and risk management specialist

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

SC
Sarah Chen

Expert technical analysis and market insights. Follow us for the latest cryptocurrency analysis.

View all articles
Comments
Comments