China Declines Crypto Lending Relief in Landmark Court Ruling!

MET

MET/USDT

$0.2390
+0.67%
24h Volume

$17,675,725.47

24h H/L

$0.2460 / $0.2215

Change: $0.0245 (11.06%)

Funding Rate

+0.0016%

Longs pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
MET
MET
Daily

$0.2394

1.74%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$0.2848
Resistance 2$0.2619
Resistance 1$0.2425
Price$0.2394
Support 1$0.2352
Support 2$0.2215
Support 3$0.2043
Pivot (PP):$0.238267
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):44.0
(11:53 AM UTC)
2 min read

Contents

596 views
0 comments
  • Chinese court deems crypto lending as unprotected by the country’s legal framework.
  • Mr. Ming’s attempt to recoup 80,000 Tether loan ends in disappointment.
  • This is the second such judgment invalidating crypto-based transactions.

China’s legal stance fortifies its crypto ban, making lending and transactions risky, unprotected ventures.

A Disputed Crypto Loan: The Case’s Origins

In April 2021, Mr. Ming lent 80,000 Tether (USDT) to Mr. Gang for stablecoin trading purposes. This agreement necessitated a repayment within six months. However, when Mr. Gang defaulted on the agreement, Mr. Ming decided to pursue a legal course of action, taking the matter to the Nanchang’s People Court.

Why the Court Declined Relief

The Nanchang People’s Court, in its ruling, stated that for the lawsuit to be valid, Mr. Ming had to demonstrate that Tether was a legally issued fiat currency, as per China’s Crypto Ban legislations. Failing to establish this meant that the lawsuit did not align with the permitted civil litigation parameters. Even an appeal by Mr. Ming met with dismissal, emphasizing the court’s firm stance on the matter.

Contextualizing China’s Stringent Crypto Stance

China has adopted an unwavering stance against cryptocurrencies, initiating a ban in late 2021. The country has cited concerns ranging from environmental impacts to challenges in effective surveillance. Earlier in August, a parallel incident transpired when the Changzhou Zhonglu People’s Court negated a $10 million Bitcoin lending contract. The court ruled that the lender couldn’t avail judicial relief against a borrower’s default, reinforcing the notion that crypto-related activities remain taboo within China’s borders.

Conclusion

The rulings by Chinese courts have far-reaching implications for crypto enthusiasts, traders, and lenders in the country. As the judicial system refrains from offering relief in crypto-related disputes, it underlines the inherent risks involved in such activities in China. Investors and traders must tread with caution, fully aware of the limitations and potential pitfalls that lie ahead in the realm of cryptocurrencies.

DK

David Kim

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/3/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

2/2/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

2/1/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

1/31/2026