-
Frank, ex-CEO of DeGods, lost 16 NFTs worth $19,000 in a post-resignation hack, sparking intense debate over its authenticity.
-
Critics question the hack’s timing and intent, citing the NFTs’ isolated sale and market value plunge as possible motives.
-
DeGods’ credibility wanes amid leadership changes, price drops, and past platform migration missteps hurting investor trust.
The sale of 16 DeGods NFTs has ignited a firestorm in the crypto community, casting doubt on the integrity of the events following Frank DeGods’ resignation.
Frank’s Resignation and the Sudden Sale of 16 NFTs
Frank DeGods, the founder of DeGods, announced his resignation as CEO via his X account on May 12, 2025. He shared that he would step down from leadership after three years of dedication.
“I dedicated 3 years of sleepless nights trying to make DeGods & y00ts a success. I’m proud of the work I did. I’m excited to hand the reins to the team and watch them cook. Maybe we’ll look back at this fixation on ‘frank degods’ as the thing that was holding us back,” he said on X.
Just days after the resignation announcement, Frank’s Solana wallet was compromised, leading to the sale of 16 DeGods NFTs on the Magic Eden platform.
According to a Discord chat allegedly from the DeGods team, Frank’s account was hacked. The laptop he used for transactions was compromised, allowing the hacker to earn over 108 SOL, equivalent to nearly $19,000, from the stolen NFTs.
A Hack or Did Frank Sell the NFTs Himself?
Frank and the team insist this was a hack. However, the crypto community remains divided, with some believing the claim and others questioning its motives.
“I’m not seeing any other assets stolen. So the hacker was kind enough to only sell his DeGods and nothing else?” an X user questioned.
Another X user claimed that the timing of the sale is suspicious. Meanwhile, other users suggested the incident might be a staged move to allow Frank to exit the project without backlash.
These suspicions aren’t baseless. The timing of the hack, immediately following Frank’s resignation, raises questions about intent. Additionally, DeGods’ value has significantly declined from its peak of over $37,000 to just $1,000.
Some speculate Frank may have chosen this moment to “cash out” before the NFT’s value drops further. However, no concrete evidence supports these accusations, and Frank maintains he was the victim of a cyberattack.
This decline reflects broader NFT market sentiment, which has cooled significantly since the 2021-2022 boom.
Moreover, DeGods has faced controversy before, particularly with its decision to migrate from Solana to Ethereum and later return to Solana, alienating parts of its community. These choices and a lack of innovation and market pressures have eroded DeGods’ former prominence.
Whether genuine or orchestrated, Frank’s hack has amplified uncertainty, leaving investors questioning the project’s recovery potential.
Conclusion
As the dust settles on this incident, the future of DeGods remains shrouded in uncertainty. Investors are left pondering the implications of leadership changes, market dynamics, and the integrity of the NFT space itself. While the community debates and dissects the events, one thing is clear: transparency and trust are now more crucial than ever for the survival of projects in this volatile landscape.
