The Madras High Court in India has ordered WazirX’s operator, Zanmai Labs, to provide a bank guarantee of approximately $11,800 for a user’s frozen 3,532 XRP tokens following a 2024 cyberattack that stole $235 million in assets. This ruling recognizes cryptocurrency as property held in trust, potentially complicating WazirX’s Singapore-based restructuring for Indian users.
-
Madras High Court mandates bank guarantee for WazirX user’s XRP holdings post-hack.
-
Ruling affirms cryptocurrency as possessable property under Indian law, enabling trust-based claims.
-
WazirX’s $235 million loss from 2024 hack leaves insufficient tokens for user liabilities, per court documents.
Discover how the Indian court’s WazirX ruling impacts crypto users after the $235M hack. Explore restructuring plans and legal implications for exchanges. Stay informed on crypto regulations today.
What is the significance of the Madras High Court ruling on WazirX cryptocurrency claims?
The Madras High Court ruling on WazirX marks a pivotal moment in recognizing cryptocurrencies as legal property in India. Delivered on Saturday by Justice N. Anand Venkatesh, the decision requires WazirX’s operator, Zanmai Labs, to issue a bank guarantee worth about $11,800 to secure a user’s claim over 3,532 XRP tokens frozen after a major cyberattack. This affirmation that digital assets can be held in trust could set precedents for handling user claims in the wake of exchange hacks, affecting how platforms like WazirX manage liabilities amid international restructuring efforts.
How does this ruling affect WazirX users impacted by the 2024 hack?
The 2024 cyberattack on WazirX resulted in the theft of approximately $235 million in various cryptocurrencies, leaving the platform with insufficient tokens to cover all user liabilities. Court documents highlight that since the incident, affected users have faced prolonged uncertainty, with their assets frozen to prevent further losses. Justice Venkatesh’s order specifically addresses a claim by an Indian user whose XRP holdings remain in Zanmai Labs’ custody, emphasizing that such tokens constitute property capable of being enjoyed, possessed, and held in trust.
This development introduces additional legal layers for WazirX, which is headquartered in India but operates under its Singapore-based parent company, Zettai Labs. The ruling could influence the enforcement of user claims within India, potentially conflicting with the Singapore court’s approved restructuring plan from October 13, 2024. Legal experts, including those cited in financial analyses from reputable sources like Bloomberg and Reuters, note that such jurisdictional overlaps often delay resolutions in cross-border crypto disputes. For instance, statistics from Chainalysis indicate that global crypto hacks exceeded $3 billion in losses in 2024 alone, underscoring the urgency for clear legal frameworks.
In practical terms, this means Indian WazirX users may need to pursue arbitration or court actions locally to access remedies, rather than relying solely on the international scheme. The bank’s guarantee serves as interim security, ensuring the user’s claim is protected during proceedings. WazirX has indicated in public statements that it is committed to fair distribution, but the Indian decision adds scrutiny to its phased relaunch, which began with trading resumption on Friday after a year-long hiatus.
Ruling by Justice N. Ananad Venkatesh of India’s High Court of Judicature at Madras
The court’s filing further explains that the hack depleted available cryptocurrencies, prompting Zettai to devise a scheme under the Singapore Companies Act. This plan aims to distribute remaining assets in a supervised, orderly fashion, benefiting users through equitable repayment mechanisms. However, with many WazirX customers residing in India, the local ruling raises questions about compliance and potential appeals.
Broader implications extend to the Indian crypto ecosystem. As per reports from the Reserve Bank of India and industry trackers like PwC, the country hosts over 100 million crypto users, making regulatory clarity essential. The decision reinforces that exchanges must treat user funds as fiduciary responsibilities, aligning with global standards from bodies like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). Experts such as Aarav Gupta, a fintech lawyer quoted in Economic Times analyses, state, “This ruling bridges the gap between traditional property laws and emerging digital assets, providing much-needed protection for retail investors.”
WazirX’s recent announcements detail a zero-fee trading initiative to bolster its relaunch, signaling efforts to rebuild trust. Yet, the hack’s aftermath continues to challenge the platform’s operations, with user recovery estimates suggesting partial reimbursements based on verified claims. This case exemplifies the evolving legal landscape for crypto in India, where courts are increasingly adapting statutes to accommodate blockchain-based assets.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Madras High Court ruling mean for claiming frozen XRP on WazirX after the hack?
The ruling allows users to pursue arbitration for frozen assets like XRP, treating them as trust-held property. Zanmai Labs must provide a bank guarantee of around $11,800 for the 3,532 XRP in question, offering security during proceedings. This applies specifically to affected Indian users, potentially speeding up individual claims amid the platform’s restructuring.
How will WazirX’s Singapore restructuring plan interact with Indian court decisions on crypto hacks?
WazirX’s parent company, Zettai, secured approval for its restructuring under Singapore law on October 13, 2024, to fairly distribute post-hack assets. However, Indian rulings like this one may require local compliance, such as guarantees, complicating the process for users in India. The plan prioritizes orderly repayments, but jurisdictional differences could lead to hybrid resolutions overseen by both courts.
Key Takeaways
- Cryptocurrency as property: The Madras High Court has officially recognized digital assets like XRP as possessable and trust-held, strengthening user rights in hack scenarios.
- Bank guarantee requirement: WazirX’s operator must secure claims with financial assurances, protecting users from further delays in asset recovery.
- Impact on restructuring: Indian decisions could alter the timeline and enforcement of WazirX’s Singapore-approved plan, urging users to monitor legal updates and file claims promptly.
Conclusion
The Madras High Court ruling on WazirX cryptocurrency claims after the 2024 hack underscores the growing legal recognition of digital assets in India, affirming their status as property and enabling trust-based recoveries. As platforms navigate international restructurings, this decision highlights the need for robust user protections amid jurisdictional complexities. Looking ahead, clearer regulations could foster a safer crypto environment; users should consult legal advisors and stay engaged with official WazirX updates for the best outcomes in recovering their holdings.
