Michael Saylor, Tom Lee Among Executives May Pitch Budget-Neutral Strategies for BITCOIN Act, U.S. Bitcoin Reserve

• What: BITCOIN Act aims for a one‑million BTC Strategic Bitcoin Reserve over five years.

• Who: 18 industry executives, including Michael Saylor, Tom Lee and mining and TradFi representatives.

• How: Proposals focus on budget‑neutral funding—tariff surplus, Treasury asset revaluation, or Federal Reserve mechanisms.

Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: experts meet to shape the BITCOIN Act — learn proposed budget‑neutral funding options and next steps. Read analysis now.

What is the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?

The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is a legislative proposal tied to the BITCOIN Act that would direct the U.S. government to acquire one million Bitcoin over five years. The plan emphasizes budget‑neutral mechanisms to finance purchases so taxpayers are not directly burdened.

How does the BITCOIN Act propose to buy Bitcoin budget‑neutrally?

The BITCOIN Act, introduced by Senator Cynthia Lummis, targets a one‑million BTC purchase funded without increasing net federal spending. Proposed approaches include reallocating tariff surplus, reexamining Treasury gold certificates, and deploying Treasury or Federal Reserve balance‑sheet tools in ways that offset costs.

Why are industry leaders meeting with US lawmakers?

US lawmakers convened a roundtable with 18 executives to assess practical, budget‑neutral options to implement President Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and to accelerate momentum for the BITCOIN Act. The Digital Chambers and The Digital Power Network organized the session to build legislative support.

Who attended and what perspectives were represented?

The meeting included Strategy chairman Michael Saylor, Fundstrat/BitMine’s Tom Lee, MARA CEO Fred Thiel, mining execs from CleanSpark and Bitdeer, venture capital representatives from Off the Chain Capital and Reserve One, TradFi attendees from Western Alliance Bank and Blue Square Wealth, plus platform execs from eToro US.

How will industry pitch budget‑neutral funding strategies?

Executives outlined options focused on preserving fiscal neutrality. Short, actionable proposals discussed:

• Reallocating tariff surplus to seed purchases.
• Reevaluating Treasury-held gold certificates to free balance-sheet capacity.
• Using Federal Reserve and Treasury coordination to structure purchases without net deficit impact.

What are the next steps for the BITCOIN Act?

Lawmakers will evaluate objections raised during the roundtable and identify legislative pathways to resolve concerns. The industry aims to form a broader coalition to address technical, fiscal and national‑security questions before drafting final bill language.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many Bitcoins would the United States buy under the BITCOIN Act?

The bill targets acquiring one million Bitcoin over five years, an objective meant to be financed through budget‑neutral mechanisms rather than direct taxpayer funding.

Who is organizing the industry roundtable and why does it matter?

The Digital Chambers and the Digital Power Network organized the meeting to advise Congress on feasible funding strategies. Their input matters because it shapes how lawmakers assess fiscal and technical viability for national‑level BTC purchases.

Key Takeaways

• Legislative goal: The BITCOIN Act seeks a one‑million BTC Strategic Bitcoin Reserve over five years.
• Budget‑neutral focus: Proposals emphasize tariff revenue, Treasury asset revaluation, and Fed‑Treasury coordination to avoid new net spending.
• Cross‑sector coalition: Miners, VCs, TradFi and platform executives are collaborating to address objections and build support.

Conclusion

The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and the BITCOIN Act have moved from proposal to practical policy discussion, with industry leaders briefing lawmakers on budget‑neutral funding options. Continued collaboration between policymakers and experts will determine whether one million BTC can be acquired without increasing net federal spending; stakeholders should monitor legislative developments closely.