Pressure Mounts on Crypto Tycoon Sam Bankman-Fried

FTT

FTT/USDT

$0.3539
-4.69%
24h Volume

$385,813.98

24h H/L

$0.3733 / $0.3407

Change: $0.0326 (9.57%)

Funding Rate

+0.0013%

Longs pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
FTT
FTT
Daily

$0.3539

-4.58%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$0.4862
Resistance 2$0.4107
Resistance 1$0.3712
Price$0.3539
Support 1$0.3407
Support 2$0.3060
Support 3$0.1736
Pivot (PP):$0.355967
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):29.1
(11:49 AM UTC)
2 min read

Contents

1476 views
0 comments
  • The U.S. Department of Justice is pushing for the arrest of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF).
  • The Department accuses SBF of attempting to influence witnesses.
  • The defense team responds strongly, denying the allegations.

The U.S. Department of Justice is advocating for the arrest of Sam Bankman-Fried, alleging that he has been trying to influence witnesses. The defense team has countered these allegations, maintaining that they are unfounded.

U.S. Department of Justice’s Response to SBF’s Defense

The U.S. Department of Justice has responded to the defense team of Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), accusing him of painting himself in a negative light. The Department pointed out that SBF did not deny giving the diary of former Alameda Research CEO, Caroline Ellison, to the New York Times. They argue that due to this, he should remain in custody until the trial. The Department believes that SBF has gone far beyond fair commentary by sharing personal data.

In their initial application last week, the Department drew attention to SBF’s alleged attempts to negatively influence witnesses. Examples cited included SBF’s use of a VPN, reaching out to FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller, and sharing Ellison’s diary.

SBF’s Defense Team’s Response

In response to the Department of Justice, SBF’s lawyers argued on Tuesday that the actions were mischaracterized and painted SBF in a bad light. They stated that the former exchange CEO was merely trying to defend his reputation against the press and initially did not reach out to Miller. The Department of Justice, however, countered that the defense team had mischaracterized the actions. They reiterated that SBF’s actions have painted him in a negative light.

Department of Justice’s Allegations

The Department of Justice has claimed that SBF has repeatedly tried to influence witness statements, arguing that the bail conditions are insufficient to protect the public. They have suggested that SBF should be sent to prison before his hearing in October.

Conclusion

The U.S. Department of Justice and Sam Bankman-Fried’s defense team are locked in a battle over allegations of witness tampering. As the case unfolds, the crypto community will be watching closely to see how these accusations impact SBF and the broader cryptocurrency landscape.

SBF Internetsiz Telefon Kullanabilecek1
EW

Emily Watson

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/3/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

2/2/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

2/1/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

1/31/2026