SEC’s Retort to Coinbase: They Knew They Were Breaking the Law

  • The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has expressed skepticism over Coinbase’s claim that it was unaware of violating securities laws.
  • SEC lawyers argued that Coinbase, a billion-dollar organization advised by sophisticated legal consultants, should have been aware of the risk of violating federal securities laws.
  • The SEC previously alleged that Coinbase referenced the Howey test when deciding whether to list an asset on its website, and claimed that nine cryptocurrencies were investment contracts and were offered for sale on Coinbase without registration.

SEC Questions Coinbase’s Claim of Ignorance in Securities Law Violation

SEC’s Skepticism Over Coinbase’s Claim

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has cast doubt on Coinbase’s assertion that it was oblivious to any infringement of securities laws. This skepticism was expressed in response to Coinbase’s request for the dismissal of a lawsuit. The SEC’s stance indicates a lack of belief in the cryptocurrency exchange’s claim of ignorance towards any potential legal violations.

SEC’s Argument Against Coinbase

SEC lawyers have made a compelling argument against Coinbase’s claim of unawareness. They pointed out that Coinbase, a multi-billion dollar entity with access to high-level legal advice, should have been cognizant of the potential risk of breaching federal securities laws. They further argued that Coinbase’s assertion that the SEC approved its prospectus in 2021, thereby validating the legality of its core business activities, is questionable. In essence, the SEC lawyers contended that Coinbase accepted the legal framework it now claims is not applicable to its operations as a basis for its listing decisions.

SEC’s Previous Allegations Against Coinbase

The SEC had previously accused Coinbase of using the Howey test as a reference point when deciding whether or not to list an asset on its website. The regulatory body claimed that nine cryptocurrencies, including SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, NEAR, VGX, DASH, SAND, ICP, NEXO, AXS, CHZ, and FLOW, were investment contracts and were sold on Coinbase without proper registration. This allegation forms a significant part of the SEC’s case against the cryptocurrency exchange.

A decision on Coinbase’s request for dismissal of the lawsuit will be made in the coming days after the judge examines the arguments presented by both sides.

Don't forget to enable notifications for our Twitter account and Telegram channel to stay informed about the latest cryptocurrency news.

BREAKING NEWS

Michigan State Retirement Fund Invests $10 Million in Grayscale Ethereum Trust, Securing Major Stake

The Michigan State Retirement Fund has strategically positioned itself...

Grayscale Proposes Listing for Grayscale Digital Large Cap Fund (GDLC) as ETP with Bitcoin Dominating Holdings

On November 4, COINOTAG News reported that Grayscale has...

Fragmetric Completes Builder Round Financing to Enhance Solana Ecosystem Security and Liquidity

On November 4th, COINOTAG News reported that Fragmetric, a...

Vitalik Buterin Warns Against Exclusion of Russian Developers in Open Source Community

On November 4th, Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, took...

Bitcoin Volatility Soars Amid U.S. Election Impact on Crypto Markets

Bitcoin Volatility Surges as U.S. Election Heightens Stakes for...
spot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Related Articles

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_imgspot_img