Charles O. Parks III Sentenced for Alleged Cryptojacking Scheme Involving Ether and Other Cryptocurrencies

ETH

ETH/USDT

$2,127.12
+4.51%
24h Volume

$39,049,302,904.94

24h H/L

$2,145.26 / $2,009.54

Change: $135.72 (6.75%)

Long/Short
69.8%
Long: 69.8%Short: 30.2%
Funding Rate

-0.0018%

Shorts pay

Data provided by COINOTAG DATALive data
Ethereum
Ethereum
Daily

$2,121.96

1.67%

Volume (24h): -

Resistance Levels
Resistance 3$2,577.98
Resistance 2$2,403.28
Resistance 1$2,234.29
Price$2,121.96
Support 1$1,994.75
Support 2$1,826.83
Support 3$1,157.44
Pivot (PP):$2,110.44
Trend:Downtrend
RSI (14):32.9
(02:07 AM UTC)
3 min read

Contents

1084 views
0 comments

  • Parks exploited cloud computing resources to mine nearly $1 million worth of cryptocurrencies like Ether, Litecoin, and Monero.

  • Parks misrepresented his intentions to cloud providers, claiming to establish an online training firm.

  • He laundered the mined crypto to fund luxury purchases, including a Mercedes-Benz and jewelry.

Charles O. Parks III was sentenced for a large-scale cryptojacking operation, defrauding cloud providers. Learn more about the case and its implications.

What is Cryptojacking?

Cryptojacking is the unauthorized use of someone else’s computing resources to mine cryptocurrency. In this case, Parks used cloud computing resources without permission, resulting in significant financial losses for the providers.

How Did Parks Execute His Scheme?

Parks deceived cloud providers by creating fake corporate identities, claiming he would build an online training firm. In reality, he had no such business and used the resources solely for mining cryptocurrencies. Prosecutors noted that he misled providers about data usage and unpaid balances.


Frequently Asked Questions

What are the consequences of cryptojacking?

Cryptojacking can lead to severe legal consequences, including imprisonment and financial penalties, as seen in the case of Charles O. Parks III.

How can companies protect against cryptojacking?

Companies can protect against cryptojacking by implementing robust security measures, monitoring resource usage, and educating employees about potential threats.

Key Takeaways

  • Parks exploited cloud resources: He used stolen computing power to mine cryptocurrencies.
  • Misrepresentation was key: Parks falsely claimed to be starting a legitimate business.
  • Laundering funds: He converted mined crypto into cash for luxury purchases.

Conclusion

Charles O. Parks III’s case highlights the serious implications of cryptojacking in the cryptocurrency space. By misusing cloud resources and engaging in fraudulent activities, he faced significant legal repercussions. This incident serves as a reminder for companies to enhance their cybersecurity measures and for individuals to be aware of the risks associated with cryptocurrency mining.

Litecoin, Fraud, Mining, Monero, Cloud Services
Parks (pictured) also went by the moniker “CP30,” a humanoid robot from the Sci-Fi franchise Star Wars. Source: MultiMillionaire LLC
DK

David Kim

COINOTAG author

View all posts

Comments

Comments

Other Articles

Bitcoin Price Analysis: Will the Uptrend Continue?

2/8/2026

Ethereum 2.0 Update: How Will It Affect the Crypto Market?

2/7/2026

The Coming of Altcoin Season: Which Coins Will Stand Out?

2/6/2026

DeFi Protocols and Yield Farming Strategies

2/5/2026