• ZachXBT’s frustration stems from InfoFi platforms flooding crypto social media with low-quality, AI-generated content.

• These platforms reward users for posts and analysis, but critics argue they promote spam and attention farming over genuine value.

• Over 144,000 X accounts linked to Xeet have already been scraped, highlighting the scale of engagement in InfoFi ecosystems.

Discover ZachXBT’s bold $5K bounty targeting InfoFi platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe for exposing AI spam. Learn how these systems impact crypto communities and what it means for authentic engagement. Stay informed—read now!

What is ZachXBT’s Bounty on InfoFi Platforms?

ZachXBT’s bounty on InfoFi platforms targets user data from services like Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, Wallchain, and Xeet to investigate alleged AI-driven spam and low-quality content proliferation. Announced on his Telegram channel, the $5,000 reward incentivizes scraping usernames, IDs, on-chain addresses, and scores to reveal manipulative practices. This move underscores growing concerns in the crypto community about the authenticity of engagement-driven reward systems.

What Are Information Finance (InfoFi) Platforms and Their Role in Crypto?

Information Finance, or InfoFi, platforms emerged in the crypto space as mechanisms to monetize user-generated content related to market analysis, predictions, and social commentary. These systems employ AI algorithms, token incentives, and community voting to evaluate and reward contributions, effectively transforming information into a tradable asset. According to industry observers, InfoFi gained traction during the recent bull cycle, with platforms like Kaito Yaps aggregating on-chain data and discussions to help traders spot trends.

However, challenges have arisen as adoption surged. Blockchain analyst ZachXBT has highlighted how relaxed evaluation criteria have led to an influx of automated replies, spam posts, and “attention farming,” diluting the quality of crypto discourse. Data from community reports indicates that engagement metrics on these platforms have spiked by over 200% in the past year, but much of it stems from bots and coordinated groups rather than organic interaction.

Proponents, including developers at Galxe and Layer3, argue that InfoFi fosters community participation and democratizes access to insights. Yet, critics like Ubee, a former Vertex Protocol team member, describe them as “coordinated attention farms,” where projects hype launches only to see activity vanish post-token generation event (TGE). An expert quote from commentator Azel captures the sentiment: “The algorithms reward activity over insight, turning users into mercenaries rather than thinkers.”

Frequently Asked Questions

What Platforms Are Included in ZachXBT’s InfoFi Bounty?

ZachXBT’s bounty specifically targets Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, Wallchain, and Xeet, focusing on scraping comprehensive user data such as usernames, IDs, on-chain addresses, and activity scores. The initiative began with a $5,000 reward for the full dataset, later expanded to individual bounties per platform. Xeet’s data, involving 144,000 X accounts, was completed shortly after the announcement, demonstrating the initiative’s rapid progress.

How Do InfoFi Platforms Affect Crypto Social Media Engagement?

InfoFi platforms boost engagement by rewarding posts with tokens, but this often results in cluttered feeds filled with repetitive, AI-generated content that prioritizes volume over value. Users on platforms like X report increased spam in even charitable threads, eroding trust in community discussions. As one NFT enthusiast noted, participants feel “used” after investing time for minimal returns, prompting calls for stricter moderation to restore authenticity.

Key Takeaways

• ZachXBT’s Bounty Highlights Risks: The $5,000 incentive aims to uncover how InfoFi platforms enable spam, potentially leading to broader regulatory scrutiny in crypto social ecosystems.
• Community Backlash Grows: Voices like Ubee’s thread on X label InfoFi as scams that drain authenticity, with post-TGE activity drops evidencing unsustainable hype cycles.
• Future of Engagement: To combat AI slop, projects should prioritize quality metrics and human moderation, encouraging genuine contributions over farmed attention.

Conclusion

ZachXBT’s InfoFi bounty initiative against platforms like Kaito Yaps and Galxe exposes critical vulnerabilities in reward-based Information Finance systems, where AI-driven content threatens the integrity of crypto conversations. As community frustration mounts over spam and lost credibility, this development signals a pivotal moment for reevaluating engagement models. Looking ahead, fostering transparent, value-driven platforms will be essential to sustain healthy growth in the evolving digital asset landscape—explore more insights on en.coinotag.com to stay ahead.

The blockchain investigator ZachXBT is part of a community frustrated by accounts on social media promoting Information Finance (InfoFi) platforms, specifically namedropping Kaito Yaps, Galxe, Layer3, Cookie, Wallchain, and Xeet.

InfoFi applications crawled into the crypto cycle as a way to reward users for producing analysis, predictions, market commentary, or social posts. Their systems rely on AI models, token rewards, and community moderation to determine which contributions hold value.

Proponents say the model turns information into a tradable asset, but naysayers like ZachXBT believe the surge of projects built on this idea has weakened evaluation rules and has encouraged spam, automated replies, and “attention farming.”

“All the meta has done is boost AI slop and low-quality content while pretending it brought sticky users to the project. It was profitable early on before it became saturated,” he said on X in July, responding to an account promoting Kaito Yaps.

ZachXBT launches bounty push for user data

In a post to his Telegram channel on Monday, ZachXBT accused the targeted InfoFi platforms of incentivizing AI-driven posting behavior that bloats feeds with low-value submissions. He added that it had reached the point where even donation threads for open-source developers were being flooded with “AI garbage content.”

“$5K bounty to the first person who can successfully scrape all Kaito Yaps, Wallchain, Galxe, Layer 3, Cookie, Xeet users. Please capture any data available (username, user id, onchain address, score/points, etc). Send me a DM on X once completed,” the 2D investigator announced.

Hours later, ZachXBT posted another update on his channel, writing: “To make it a bit easier I’ll be rewarding bounties for data sets from each of the six InfoFi platforms I stated. Xeet (144K X accounts) has already been completed.”

Opposition to InfoFi influencers has grown throughout the year, with more Crypto Twitter members complaining about engagement-driven scoring systems that reward volume over meaning.

Some community members say the model has created a cycle where projects must constantly manufacture hype to keep participants active, which has drained the authenticity out of the conversations it was meant to enhance.

Ubee, a user on X who was a part of the Vertex Protocol support team, called InfoFi platforms the “most widely promoted scams” in this crypto cycle.

“Most projects pushed out through Kaito and other infoFi platforms are nothing but coordinated attention farms if a new project needs your attention so urgently that alone should be a red flag. Funny how after TGE community evaporates and we watch the project hard reset to zero every single time,” the crypto trader bashed the projects in a thread on X.

infoFi is one of the most widely promoted scams in this cycle.

most projects pushed out through Kaito and other infoFi platforms are nothing but coordinated attention farms.

attention isn’t free.

attention is time and time is money.

if a new project needs your attention so…

— Ubee (@theUbee_) December 8, 2025

According to Ubee, the crypto audience is beginning to recognize how much credibility these systems have lost, alongside how feeds are now clogged with “technical jargon, scripted prompts and repetitive commentary” with no originality.

AI-driven engagement crypto promotions unwelcome on X

One of the projects named by ZachXBT, Kaito Yaps, launched in 2022 as an AI-powered research platform for digital assets. Its tools aggregate market intelligence, on-chain data, and community discussions, and many traders use it to follow emerging sector trends.

The other platforms share similar reward models from user engagement, community tasks or points-based activity systems. Some opponents propounded that these incentives are exploited by automated bots and coordinated groups who flood feeds to maximize token earnings.

“What to say about InfoFi … at first it looked good, but as time passed … I just feel used…Do we really want to continue to be used to promoting some projects just so they take the $ and we get peanuts for our time?” an NFT enthusiast who has been in the information finance community complained.

Some users also claim many InfoFi platforms have begun to extract value from their own communities, adding that contributors were being “farmed” alongside the data they produced.

“Instead of experts, we have an army of mercenaries. Instead of discussions, we have ‘Reply Guys’ on steroids. The algorithms behind platforms like Kaito or Cookie reward activity and engagement. The moment the metric becomes the goal, it ceases to be a good metric. The user base has stopped thinking, and they have started executing tasks,” commentator Azel reiterated.