Athena Bitcoin is accused of charging undisclosed fees at crypto ATMs and failing to stop fraud, with Washington, DC alleging 93% of deposits were scam-related, median victim age 71 and median loss $8,000; the suit seeks restitution and injunctions against the operator.
-
Athena allegedly charged up to 26% in undisclosed transaction fees.
-
Washington, DC says 93% of early deposits were tied to scams and targeted vulnerable adults.
-
FBI reports nearly 11,000 crypto ATM complaints in 2024 totaling $246 million in losses.
Athena Bitcoin undisclosed fees: DC sues crypto ATM operator over alleged hidden fees and scam facilitation — learn the risks and how to protect yourself.
Washington, DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb alleges Athena Bitcoin charged undisclosed fees and lacked safeguards to stop fraud and scams at its crypto ATMs.
The Attorney General’s office in Washington, DC, has filed suit against crypto ATM operator Athena Bitcoin, alleging it charged undisclosed fees on deposits the company knew were tied to scams and failed to implement adequate anti-fraud measures. The complaint states that during Athena’s first five months operating in DC (May–September 2024) the vast majority of deposits were scam-related, and that Athena’s no‑refund policy prevented victims from recovering alleged hidden fees and losses.
What is the DC lawsuit against Athena Bitcoin about?
Athena Bitcoin lawsuit alleges the operator charged consumers undisclosed fees of up to 26% at crypto ATMs and knowingly processed scam-driven deposits without meaningful fraud controls. The suit seeks restitution for victims, injunctive relief, and penalties under consumer protection and elder-protection laws.
How did Athena allegedly profit from undisclosed fees?
The complaint alleges Athena labeled charges ambiguously as a “Transaction Service Margin” instead of clearly disclosing a fee, enabling the operator to pocket substantial sums. Washington, DC states Athena “pocketed hundreds of thousands of dollars” in the first five months of operation in the district.
Key figures cited in the filing: 93% of deposits were alleged to be the direct result of scams, median victim age 71, and median loss per transaction $8,000. One resident reportedly lost $98,000 at an Athena kiosk.
How can users avoid being scammed at crypto ATMs?
- Do not send money to strangers: Never transfer funds to someone you have not met in person.
- Verify contacts independently: Contact institutions or representatives using official phone numbers or websites (don’t use numbers provided in unsolicited messages).
- Refuse pressure tactics: Scammers often create urgency; pause and seek advice from trusted family or financial institutions.
- Ask for written details: If someone demands crypto, request written documentation and review with a trusted adviser.
- Report suspicious activity: Contact local law enforcement and relevant consumer protection authorities if you suspect fraud.
Scammers frequently impersonate crypto tech support or claim to offer guaranteed trading profits. The Attorney General warns that predatory conduct has targeted older adults and other vulnerable groups.
Why is this case part of a wider crypto ATM crackdown?
Regulators and law enforcement have increased scrutiny of crypto ATMs after a surge in reported fraud. The FBI reported nearly 11,000 complaints from kiosks in 2024 totaling about $246 million in losses. Several U.S. states, including Arizona, Colorado, and Michigan, have imposed transaction limits to curb abuse.
There are approximately 26,850 crypto ATMs in the U.S., according to CoinATMRadar. Market-share estimates show Bitcoin Depot at 27.6%, CoinFlip at 13.6%, and Athena at about 13% of machines.
What laws and precedents relate to undisclosed fee claims?
Failing to disclose fees is a longstanding regulatory focus in financial services. Recent high‑profile enforcement actions against banks and financial firms for undisclosed or illegal fees highlight regulators’ willingness to seek large restitution amounts and fines. The DC complaint frames Athena’s conduct as deceptive and harmful to vulnerable consumers, invoking consumer protection and elder‑abuse statutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can victims recover funds from Athena Bitcoin?
Washington, DC’s lawsuit seeks restitution and injunctive relief; outcomes depend on the court process. Victims should preserve transaction records and contact the Attorney General’s office for claim guidance.
Are crypto ATMs regulated federally?
Crypto ATM regulation is a mix of federal and state oversight; consumer protections can vary by jurisdiction. Enforcement actions and state transaction limits have increased in response to reported fraud.
How can I verify whether a crypto ATM operator discloses fees clearly?
Check posted machine disclosures, the operator’s terms of service, and any on‑screen fee confirmations. If fees are ambiguous or labeled vaguely, treat transactions with caution and ask for clarification beforehand.
Key Takeaways
- Alleged undisclosed fees: Athena is accused of charging up to 26% without clear disclosure.
- High scam incidence: The DC filing alleges 93% of early deposits were scam-related, often impacting elderly victims.
- Protective actions: Users should verify contacts independently, refuse pressure tactics, and report suspected fraud.
Conclusion
The Athena Bitcoin lawsuit spotlights alleged undisclosed fees and anti‑fraud failures at crypto ATMs, raising broader questions about operator transparency and consumer protections. Ongoing regulatory and enforcement responses aim to limit kiosk‑driven fraud; consumers should exercise caution and report suspicious activity to authorities.
