Bitwise has amended its US Solana ETF filing to add staking and set an annual management fee of 0.20%, positioning the offering as a competitively priced, physically backed Solana staking ETF with strong inflow potential versus higher-fee alternatives.
-
0.20% annual fee on Bitwise Solana Staking ETF
-
Physically backed Solana with a staking feature and mid-range fee compared with peers.
-
Industry reaction highlights fee competition; tracking and inflows will determine market success.
Solana ETF: Bitwise files a 0.20% Solana Staking ETF with physical backing and staking — read expert analysis, fee comparison, and inflow outlook now.
Bitwise is seemingly already moving to undercut other issuers with its Solana Staking ETF, proposing an annual fee of just 0.20%.
Asset manager Bitwise amended its US filing to propose a Solana Staking ETF with a 0.20% annual management fee and a staking feature. ETF analysts say the fee signals likely fee competition among issuers and could boost inflows if tracking and custody are robust.
What is Bitwise’s proposed Solana Staking ETF?
Bitwise’s proposed Solana ETF is a US-registered exchange-traded fund that would be physically backed by spot Solana (SOL) and include an on-chain staking feature, with an annual management fee of 0.20%. The filing updates the original application to add staking and to set the fee level.
How does the 0.20% fee compare to other crypto ETFs?
The 0.20% fee sits in the mid-range for crypto ETFs, where fees typically span 0.15%–0.75%. For context, the first Solana staking ETF listed (REX-Osprey Solana Staking ETF, SSK) charges 0.75% and had $12 million of inflows on debut. Lower fees historically attract more assets under management (AUM), especially for retail and institutional allocation decisions.
Why does staking matter for a Solana ETF?
Staking adds potential yield by participating in network validation, which can be shared with ETF holders after fees. A staking-enabled ETF can differentiate on total return versus a pure spot ETF, but it also requires robust custody, validator selection, and operational transparency to manage slashing and reward distribution risks.
What are the market and analyst reactions?
ETF analysts noted the low fee as a deliberate competitive move. Analyst comments described the 0.20% fee as an aggressive pricing tactic likely intended to capture flows early. Observers also contrasted Bitwise’s filing with SSK’s higher fee and noted reported tracking issues with some competing products.
When could approval and launches occur?
Industry forecasts have suggested possible approvals for staking-enabled Solana ETFs in the weeks following filings. Exact SEC timelines remain uncertain; approval windows depend on regulatory review, operational readiness, and any additional information requests from regulators.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Bitwise’s 0.20% fee affect investors?
Lower fees reduce drag on returns and can attract both retail and institutional capital. For long-term holders, a 0.20% fee materially improves net performance versus higher-fee alternatives over multi-year horizons.
Will staking change Solana ETF returns?
Yes. Staking can add incremental yield to total returns, but net benefit depends on the fee structure, validator performance, and any operational costs associated with staking.
Key Takeaways
- Fee advantage: Bitwise’s 0.20% positions the ETF competitively versus higher-fee staking products.
- Product design: Physical backing plus staking can boost total return but requires reliable custody and validator management.
- Market view: Fee competition may drive inflows; tracking accuracy and operational transparency will be key differentiators.
Conclusion
Bitwise’s amended Solana ETF filing, with its 0.20% fee and staking feature, signals intensified fee competition in the Solana ETF market. Investors should weigh fee savings against tracking, custody, and staking execution when evaluating offerings. Monitor filings and regulatory updates for final approvals and product launches.
