-
Kenya’s emerging crypto sector faces regulatory challenges as concerns grow over Binance-linked influence in the proposed VASP Bill.
-
Local startups warn that the inclusion of the Virtual Asset Chamber of Commerce (VAC), allegedly backed by Binance, on the regulatory board could compromise fair competition and regulatory independence.
-
According to COINOTAG, stakeholders question the transparency and impartiality of VAC’s role, highlighting potential conflicts of interest in Kenya’s crypto regulatory framework.
Kenya’s crypto startups raise alarms over Binance-linked VAC’s influence in the VASP Bill, risking regulatory bias and impacting fair competition in digital assets.
Binance-Linked VAC’s Role in Shaping Kenya’s VASP Regulations
The proposed Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Bill in Kenya has sparked significant debate, particularly regarding the role of the Virtual Asset Chamber of Commerce (VAC) on the new regulatory board. Reports indicate that VAC, a private think tank, is closely associated with Binance through a monthly payment arrangement reportedly amounting to $6,000 per country for policy advocacy. This financial relationship raises concerns about the potential for regulatory capture, where rules could be tailored to favor Binance’s interests over those of local crypto startups.
Critics argue that VAC’s involvement undermines the independence of Kenya’s regulatory process. Several stakeholders have voiced apprehensions that VAC’s presence on the board, combined with its sponsorship ties, could skew the regulatory environment, limiting opportunities for smaller, homegrown crypto enterprises. The lack of transparency regarding VAC’s partnerships further fuels skepticism, as Binance is notably absent from VAC’s public partner listings despite reported financial ties.
Implications for Kenya’s Crypto Ecosystem and Regulatory Integrity
The inclusion of VAC in Kenya’s regulatory framework has broader implications beyond immediate policy outcomes. Industry insiders warn that if entities with perceived conflicts of interest dominate regulatory discussions, Kenya risks prolonged inclusion on international watchlists such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the European Union’s grey lists. Such listings can deter foreign investment and hinder the growth of the country’s digital asset market.
VAC’s director, Basil Ogolla, has defended the organization’s role, citing extensive consultations with key financial institutions including the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), and Parliament. Ogolla emphasizes that VAC’s inclusion reflects trust earned through sustained engagement. Nevertheless, the controversy underscores the delicate balance regulators must maintain to ensure fairness, transparency, and broad stakeholder representation in crypto governance.
Binance’s Expanding Influence in Global Crypto Policy
Kenya’s situation is part of a wider trend of Binance deepening its ties with governments worldwide. In May, Binance formalized a partnership with Kyrgyzstan’s National Agency for Investments to develop crypto payment systems and blockchain education, signaling its strategic push into emerging markets. CEO Richard Teng has also disclosed that Binance is advising multiple governments and sovereign wealth funds on establishing Bitcoin reserves and crafting regulatory frameworks, highlighting the exchange’s growing role as a policy influencer.
Moreover, Binance’s former CEO, Changpeng Zhao, recently took on an advisory role with Pakistan’s Crypto Council, reinforcing the company’s footprint in shaping national crypto strategies. These developments illustrate Binance’s dual approach of expanding market presence while actively engaging in regulatory discourse, which can yield both opportunities and challenges for local crypto ecosystems.
Looking Ahead: Navigating Regulatory Fairness and Market Growth
As Kenya moves forward with the VASP Bill, the crypto community faces a critical juncture. Ensuring that regulatory bodies operate with impartiality and inclusivity will be essential to fostering a competitive and innovative market. Stakeholders are encouraged to advocate for transparent governance structures that prevent undue influence by dominant players while supporting the development of local startups.
Engagement from diverse industry participants, alongside vigilant oversight by government agencies such as the National Treasury, CBK, and Capital Markets Authority (CMA), will be key to achieving balanced regulation. This approach can help Kenya harness the benefits of digital assets while maintaining compliance with international standards and safeguarding market integrity.
Conclusion
Kenya’s crypto regulatory landscape is at a pivotal moment, with the proposed VASP Bill poised to shape the future of digital asset governance. The controversy surrounding Binance-linked VAC highlights the importance of transparency and fairness in regulatory processes. Moving forward, a collaborative and balanced approach involving all stakeholders will be crucial to fostering a robust, competitive, and compliant crypto ecosystem in Kenya.
