The SEC crypto policy change centers on a proposed shift from quarterly to twice‑annual reporting and a broader, more permissive stance on token classification. The proposal could reduce reporting frequency, potentially increasing market volatility while easing compliance burdens for some issuers.
-
Key point 1 — Proposed reporting shift: quarterly to twice‑yearly.
-
Key point 2 — SEC leadership under Paul Atkins signals a lighter enforcement posture on many tokens.
-
Key point 3 — Former chair Gary Gensler defends prior enforcement record citing investor protection and FTX‑era frauds.
SEC crypto policy change, including proposed shift to twice‑annual reporting — read the latest analysis and expert reaction. Stay informed with COINOTAG.
What is the SEC crypto policy change on reporting and enforcement?
The SEC crypto policy change under the current administration proposes moving US public companies from quarterly to twice‑annual reporting while the agency signals fewer digital tokens qualify as securities. This aims to reduce regulatory burden but may affect transparency and market stability.
How did Gary Gensler defend his crypto enforcement approach?
Gary Gensler said he has no regrets about his enforcement strategy and emphasized investor protection. He cited high‑profile frauds, including FTX and Sam Bankman‑Fried, to justify aggressive actions. Gensler argued transparency through frequent reporting helps stabilize markets.
Why did the administration propose abandoning quarterly reports?
White House guidance and comments from President Donald Trump and acting regulators recommend cutting reporting cadence to twice a year to lower compliance costs and reduce short‑term focus. Acting SEC leadership has said it will “consider” the proposal and assess market feedback.
| Measure | Quarterly (Current) | Twice‑Annual (Proposed) |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 4 reports per year | 2 reports per year |
| Transparency | Higher short‑term disclosure | Lower short‑term transparency |
| Expected volatility | Potentially lower | Potentially higher |
| Compliance cost | Higher ongoing cost | Lower recurring cost |
How might investors respond to the proposed change?
Investors should review issuer disclosures, monitor SEC guidance, and weigh liquidity risks. Professional advisers may recommend enhanced due diligence on holdings with less frequent reporting. Market participants can voice preferences during any formal rulemaking comment periods.
Frequently Asked Questions
Will this reporting change reduce fraud in crypto markets?
Less frequent reporting could make short‑term fraud harder to detect. However, regulators may pair cadence changes with targeted disclosure rules to preserve investor protections. Historical fraud cases suggest transparency is a key deterrent.
What did SEC leadership under Paul Atkins say about tokens?
Acting leadership signaled that “very few tokens are securities” and has moved toward streamlined ETF listing standards. This marks a significant policy shift from the previous enforcement‑first approach.
Key Takeaways
- Reporting proposal: The administration proposes moving from quarterly to twice‑annual reporting, a change that could lower compliance costs.
- Enforcement stance: The SEC under new leadership is signaling fewer tokens qualify as securities, altering previous litigation patterns.
- Investor action: Review disclosures, increase due diligence, and monitor SEC rulemaking to adapt to reduced reporting frequency.
Conclusion
The proposed SEC crypto policy change centers on reporting cadence and token classification shifts, with potential trade‑offs between cost reduction and market transparency. COINOTAG will monitor rulemaking, publish updates and advise investors to prepare for evolving disclosure standards.
Publication date: 2025-09-19. Updated: 2025-09-19. Author: COINOTAG.
