Arkham (ARKM) Launches $1,500-a-Month Enterprise Plan, Gating Deep On-Chain Analytics

Arkham Enterprise Lands at $1,500 a Month

Arkham has split its on-chain analytics platform into a paid tier and a restricted free tier, and the line between them is now easy to draw. Enterprise, introduced on Tuesday, October 20, keeps the full record for subscribers: complete transaction history, transaction filtering, step-by-step fund tracing and counterparty views. Free accounts get a harder edge, seeing only the 100 most recent transactions per crypto wallet address, with no filtering on top of that list. For an analyst tracing a stolen fund or mapping an exchange's flows across days of activity, the cap turns a working dataset into a preview. The sign-up form on Arkham's own site puts Enterprise at $1,500 per month following a free trial period for approved accounts, a steep price for insights assembled from public blockchain data that anyone can query at the base layer.

The carve-up reaches past history. Tracer 2.0, the tool that follows funds hop by hop from one address to the next, now requires a paid account, and two quieter features moved with it: adding fresh custom labels and seeing an address's counterparties. The free tier retains Arkham's labeling, the Visualizer 2.0 graph and the block explorer, so basic lookups and graph reading survive where deep tracing does not. The company paired the launch with a grants program, set out in its official announcement, that hands approved investigators and public-interest researchers free use of Enterprise, the group with the clearest claim on public-data tooling. Arkham's brand grew out of publishing corporate Bitcoin holdings where anyone could check them. The new structure wagers that funds and investigators will pay for deeper visibility while the storefront stays open. Markets treated the change as revenue rather than retreat: the Arkham (ARKM) price climbed almost 8% within a day of the switch, even as criticism piled up online.

Nansen Taunts, ARKM Climbs Anyway

The response ran well beyond routine FUD. Nansen CEO Alex Svanevik attacked the pricing in a post on X, calling it “$1,500/mo for incorrect data” and telling analysts to “just use Nansen for FREE,” a jab from the head of a competing analytics platform that spread across crypto social media within hours. A user writing as Dominium pressed the harder argument: Arkham built its reputation on blockchain transparency and now charges $1,500 a month for tools that, in his reading, might let dubious operators keep ahead of public scrutiny. “Transparency for the rich. Darkness for everyone else,” Dominium wrote in his post, closing with a warning that paid tracing could deepen crypto's scam problem. Mohammad, a third user, predicted that open-source projects with the same feature set would surface soon, in effect a community fork of the tracing toolkit that undercuts the fee entirely, a scenario the grants program only partly answers.

@ASvanevik · X post

A post on X.

View on X

Trading told a calmer story. ARKM changed hands near $0.119 at about 1:30 p.m. UTC on October 20, and printed roughly $0.128 two hours later, at 3 p.m. UTC, as chart data tracked the climb through a paywall debate that dominated crypto timelines on Tuesday. 24-hour volume swelled from roughly $6.6 million to almost $11 million in that stretch, an increase of about 65%. At the time of writing, the token holds near $0.1276, roughly 8% higher on the session, and our live monitoring puts the gain closer to 9%. Anyone tracking whether the move extends can follow our ARKM technical analysis.

Read as a business decision, the launch is a repositioning rather than a fee hike. The official announcement states the terms plainly: $1,500 a month after a trial, with fund tracing, custom labeling and counterparty views reserved for paying accounts. Arkham built its name on transparency anyone could check at no cost; it now charges funds, on-chain investigators and market makers for the deeper layer, while Nansen and other rivals keep comparable data open. The 65% volume jump alongside an 8% price gain suggests traders priced a recurring-revenue story rather than the online backlash. The counterargument is practical, not moral: Svanevik's free-tier taunt and Mohammad's clone prediction both assume the moat has to be the data, and Arkham has not yet disclosed subscription numbers that would settle it.