Pompliano Sees Bitcoin (BTC) Up 3-4x Next Cycle While Barhydt Eyes Bond Rotation
Anthony Pompliano expects Bitcoin's next cycle to return 3-4x from the cycle low, down from 22x and 8x, while Bill Barhydt points to bond reallocation.
AI SummaryAI
- Anthony Pompliano projected a 3-4x return for Bitcoin's next cycle, measured from the cycle low.
- Fidelity's digital assets division found Bitcoin peaked above $126,000 in October 2025 as volatility declined.
- Bill Barhydt expects bond reallocation out of 60/40 portfolios to become Bitcoin's next demand source.
- Barhydt says fewer Treasury buyers would lift yields and raise US government borrowing costs.
Pompliano and Barhydt on Cycle Returns
Anthony Pompliano expects the next
Bitcoin (BTC) advance to return a fraction of what the last two did, and he put a figure on it: 3 to 4 times. He laid out the number in a conversation with Bill Barhydt, the chief executive of crypto financial services firm Abra, and stressed that the 3-4x would be measured from the low of the coming advance, not from the prevailing Bitcoin (BTC) price. The baseline he was scaling down from has itself been falling. Measured from low to high, the advance that ran from the 2018 low into the 2021 peak returned roughly 22 times, while the following cycle, from the 2022 low to the high of 2025, returned about 8 times. Shrink that again by half or more and the next advance lands inside Pompliano's 3-4x band, a path consistent with the diminishing returns that have followed each Bitcoin Halving. Barhydt accepted the arithmetic rather than contesting it. His objection was structural: as the market grows, he argued, sustaining the growth rates of earlier years becomes progressively harder, and he recalled that
Bitcoin (BTC) was still being called overvalued even when its market capitalization stood at $1 billion. On his reading, the real question for a market of this size is where the money that pushes the price higher is supposed to come from. Neither speaker treated the compressed multiple as a reason for pessimism; both framed it as the arithmetic of scale. What separates them is the funding source. Pompliano's figure describes the size of the next advance, while Barhydt's contribution to the conversation is a candidate buyer for it, and that candidate comes from the traditional portfolio, a shift with consequences he traces all the way into the Treasury market.
Fidelity Data and Barhydt's Bond Bet
Fidelity's analysis points the same way from the data side. The asset manager's digital assets division observed in May 2026 that Bitcoin had climbed past $126,000 in October 2025 even as the size of its price swings declined, and it attributed the combination to a larger market and to trading that has become easier to execute. Lower volatility also makes the asset easier for large allocators to hold, a precondition for any rotation of retirement-scale portfolios. A market that large, in other words, can set a record high without the violence that marked earlier peaks, which is precisely the environment in which smaller cycle multiples become plausible. Barhydt's answer to where the next wave of demand comes from is the bond market, or rather the money currently parked in it. He pictures United States investment advisors running client portfolios at the traditional 60 percent stocks, 40 percent bonds split, then trimming the bond sleeve and redirecting a slice of it into
Bitcoin (BTC). He followed the thought into the Treasury market itself: fewer buyers of US government debt would push yields upward as sellers demand compensation, which would raise the government's own cost of borrowing. The same flow that Washington would prefer to avoid thus becomes fresh buying pressure for Bitcoin. Whether that rotation happens is, on his account, a question of incentives. Advisors who collect 1.5 to 2 percent of assets under management regardless of results, he argued, have little reason to rewrite an allocation that keeps the fees flowing, so the bond-to-Bitcoin thesis ultimately depends on incumbents choosing to move. He is counting on money that is already invested inside the financial system, managed by advisors, rather than on first-time retail entrants alone, and he concedes that the pool of funds available to shift is finite.
Read together, the two views are not actually opposed: both treat multiple compression as an effect of market size rather than a bearish call, and even a 3-4x advance from a cycle low would repeat a multi-bagger. The live disagreement turns on a single assumption: that advisors will actually move. Demand channels from earlier cycles, from ETF flows to long-standing HODL cohorts and the largest whale wallets, are already in place; Barhydt's bond rotation needs a new actor, the fee-earning advisor, to change behavior his own fee model discourages. Our Bitcoin coverage will keep tracking whether that behavior shifts, and where the next cycle low prints against current support and resistance levels.
AI-generated, AI-reviewed, under COINOTAG editorial oversight.

