Ripple's Alderoty: Sept. 15 CLARITY Act Vote Is XRP's Key Test

Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty says the Sept. 15 Senate procedural vote will test the CLARITY Act, as SBI Ripple Asia pushes XRP Ledger payments in Japan.

(06:34 PM UTC)
4 min read
AI SummaryAI
  • SBI Ripple Asia completed registration as a third-party prepaid payment instrument issuer in March 2026.
  • SBI Ripple Asia finished its XRP Ledger token-issuance proof of concept by April 2026.
  • Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said Ripple has completed roughly $3 billion in shareholder buybacks over two years.
  • Ripple has spent about $2.5 billion on recent acquisitions, according to Garlinghouse.
Sponsored content

SBI Ripple Asia, the joint venture established by SBI Holdings and U.S.-based Ripple in 2016, is moving XRP (XRP), the native asset of the XRP Ledger and one of the largest altcoins, into a new commercial role: enterprise settlement inside Japan. The firm has long described its mission as building the internet of value across Japan and Asia. The company completed registration in March 2026 as an issuer of third-party type prepaid payment instruments under Japan's Payment Services Act and finished a proof-of-concept system for token issuance by April 2026. That legal status gives it a regulated route to operate a branded, pre-funded payment instrument for businesses, and the company says it is now building commercial features, operating procedures and concrete use cases. In an interview, Takafumi Shimoyama, General Manager and Head of Business Development, said the target clients are travel, railway and game companies that already control their own customer ecosystems. He distinguished settlement from remittance: payments discharge an obligation between buyer and seller, while remittance only moves funds between accounts. Rather than treating payments as a cost center, he described a tokenized payment tool as a growth strategy: a company can program incentives, coupons and NFT-linked rewards into the instrument, then settle on the public XRP Ledger instead of a permissioned appchain. Shimoyama contrasted that with Web2-style point programs, which tend to be uniform, and said tokenized rails allow conditional rewards tied to purchase behavior. SBI Ripple Asia previously sold RippleNet and on-demand liquidity services to banks and remittance firms across Japan and Asia; this payment-infrastructure line is its first regulated push into domestic settlement. Shimoyama said the design was inspired partly by U.S. corporate stablecoin projects, and he outlined a future in which AI agents select the best payment method by incentive and compliance, giving an AI crypto wallet or an AI trading bot the ability to move between tokenized prepaid rails and stablecoin options.

Ripple's C-suite used the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium to address two questions that have followed the company since its legal battle with the SEC: when it might go public and what U.S. law will govern its token. The discussion came as Ripple continues to expand through new partnerships and acquisitions. CEO Brad Garlinghouse said an initial public offering remains an open question, describing his stance as “more neutral” rather than a firm rejection. The company, he said, is comfortable staying private because its financial position is strong and external fundraising pressure is low; he cited roughly $3 billion in shareholder buybacks over the past two years and about $2.5 billion in recent acquisitions. Garlinghouse's wording matters because it signals Ripple is no longer categorically ruling out a listing. Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty then put a date on the policy track: Sept. 15, when the Senate will hold its first procedural vote on the CLARITY Act, a proposed U.S. digital-asset market-structure bill. Alderoty said the legislation still has a viable path in Congress and that the vote will show whether it can keep advancing; he noted that it needs 60 votes to proceed and said he expects it to move. He also cautioned that a defeat would not stop U.S. crypto rulemaking, but that the sector still needs a durable statutory framework rather than regulation alone; prolonged uncertainty, he said, could push companies and investments overseas and cost the United States jobs and innovation. Ripple's push for legislative clarity is directly tied to XRP because the bill's jurisdictional choices would determine how federal agencies oversee the token.

Read together, the two developments show Ripple working on both sides: SBI Ripple Asia is building regulated demand for the XRP Ledger in Japan, while Ripple's leadership is pressing for U.S. rules that would let it expand without a listing. The CLARITY Act is still a proposal, not a final rule — its text would bind federal agencies only if enacted, and it carries no effective date until Congress passes it and the president signs it. The Sept. 15 Senate procedural vote will test whether that text can clear a 60-vote threshold. In our view, the combination of commercial deployment on XRP Ledger and a statutory framework in Washington is the clearest path to moving XRP beyond case-by-case litigation outcomes.

Olivia Bennett

Olivia Bennett

COINOTAG author

View all posts
AI-AssistedRegulation & Compliance Editor·Olivia Bennett is a regulation and compliance editor covering the legal and policy dimensions of cryptocurrency markets.

AI-generated, AI-reviewed, under COINOTAG editorial oversight.