Stellar Network Handles 12 Million Transactions With Fees at $0.00012
Stellar processed about 12 million transactions on October 11 at an average fee of $0.00012, a seven-day low, after its Protocol 28 Adapter upgrade.
AI SummaryAI
- Stellar averaged about 12 million daily transactions on October 11, equal to 139.15 TPS.
- Average transaction fee fell to $0.00012 on October 11, a seven-day low.
- Stellar Protocol 28, the Adapter upgrade, activated before the October 11 usage surge.
- CAP 83 lets validators begin voting before the full transaction dataset arrives.
A Sunday Without the Slowdown
Stellar (XLM) recorded its heaviest and cheapest day of the past week at the same time. On-chain data from Chainspect, a platform that tracks core performance metrics across blockchain networks, shows the average transaction fee on the Stellar network fell to $0.00012 on October 11, the lowest reading in seven days, while the same day carried roughly 12 million transactions, an average of 139.15 per second. Chainspect also noted that the slowdown usually seen on Sundays failed to appear this time, with the ledger holding a steady transaction pace from start to finish. The pairing matters because congestion is the standard failure mode for a busy ledger: when demand outruns capacity, average fees climb and small transfers become uneconomical first. On October 11 the order ran the other way. Usage reached its weekly peak and the cost of moving value still sat at its weekly floor, which the tracker reads as evidence that the network kept its low-cost processing capacity under load. Sundays often run quiet across crypto rails as institutional settlement winds down, which makes a weekly volume high on that day harder to dismiss. The ledger runs as a Layer 1 blockchain built around low-cost payments, so fee behavior on a peak day is a direct test of its core promise. The readings carry extra weight because of their timing. They followed the activation of
Stellar (XLM) Protocol 28, the upgrade known as Adapter, which bundles changes written specifically to speed up consensus during periods of heavy demand. At the center of that package sits CAP 83, a proposal that rewrites how validators handle transaction sets when data spreads slowly across the network. One weekend of figures does not settle whether the upgrade delivered, but the direction, cost down and volume up on the same day, is the outcome such a change is engineered to produce.
What CAP 83 Changed
Stellar reaches agreement through repeated voting rounds among validators rather than mining, so a delayed transaction set does not merely slow one block; it can drag every round that follows it. Under the previous rules, validators waited for the complete transaction dataset before opening a vote. CAP 83 removes that dependency. Validators may now start voting before the full set of transaction data arrives, and sets that come in late or prove invalid are explicitly disabled instead of being left to wait, where they would slow the system down. The distinction matters operationally: a discarded set is removed from the round cleanly rather than clogging the queue behind data that may never arrive in time. The stated aim is to keep the consensus process running when data propagates slowly, protecting transaction capacity and flow through delivery delays. That mechanism is the bridge between the upgrade and the $0.00012 average fee recorded on the eleventh. The fee and throughput record also lands inside a broader expansion of the same ecosystem. The total value of real-world assets on
Stellar (XLM) has grown eleven-fold since January 2025, from $300 million to $3.54 billion, with Franklin Templeton's BENJI product and WisdomTree's funds identified as the main drivers of the increase. We covered that milestone when tokenized real-world asset value first reached $3.54 billion on the network. Stellar also stands out in 2026 for tokenized fund growth, with volume above $2.7 billion. On the protocol side, the Protocol 28 Adapter activation, including its contract data migration, put the new voting rules into mainnet production before the weekend arrived.
Our reading: a peak-volume day at a weekly-floor fee is the result Adapter was written to deliver, and the sequencing matters as much as the figures. Protocol 28 was already live when the surge hit, so the network ran its busiest day of the week on the new voting rules rather than meeting the load first and upgrading after. One Sunday is still a sample of one; the sharper test is sustained congestion, where the discard of late or invalid sets must keep consensus moving across repeated rounds. Our live monitoring shows XLM spot down 3.2% over the past 24 hours, a token-level move the network data does not by itself explain. Readers tracking the token can follow our XLM technical analysis for current levels. What the record does establish is that the mitigation was in production before the load arrived, and its first heavy Sunday closed with fees at a weekly floor.
AI-generated, AI-reviewed, under COINOTAG editorial oversight.

